To: AndyTheBear
Does this mean that the damage is more horrible than thought? Or does it mean that what nuclear waste standards in U.S are silly?It means that the author has an agenda: Anti-nuclear.
Fairewinds Energy Education
6 posted on
05/24/2012 8:26:59 PM PDT by
CedarDave
(Romney: Dresses and looks like a '50's character from "Mad Men" but no one's buying his shtick.)
To: CedarDave
Cesium does not accumulate in the body and so its radioisotopes are not really an environmental hazard. I’d be less than alarmist over this report. I’d compare the U.S. vs Japanese health standards. If Tokyo was considered a health hazard, the U.S. Embassy would have already evacuated its staff and dependents and issued a travellers alert.
10 posted on
05/24/2012 8:37:55 PM PDT by
Procyon
(Decentralize, degovernmentalize, deregulate, demonopolize, decredentialize, disentitle.)
To: CedarDave
Has any shown up in the US?
17 posted on
05/24/2012 8:59:54 PM PDT by
Big Horn
(Rebuild the GOP to a conservative party)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson