Posted on 05/23/2012 12:55:05 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
After downloading the file from whitehouse.gov and importing it into Adobe Illustrator, one need only to release the clipping mask in order to see two pieces of vital statistics coding not present on the original Ms. Guthrie photographed. A clipping mask that hides information is in and of itself a clear sign of document tampering, but we'll save that for another day.
Since it is impossible to scan a document and have additional information show up on the computer file that was not on the original, one must conclude that the electronic file Obama released has been tampered with and that the computer file might be the parent of the certified paper copy instead of the other way around. It also opens the possibility that yet another electronic file constructed on computer is the parent of both the certified copy Ms. Guthrie photographed and the electronic file posted on whitehouse.gov. Regardless of the exact cause of this anomaly, one this is for certain: The certified copy of Obama's birth certificate photographed by Ms. Guthrie cannot be the parent of the electronic scan posted for download at whitehouse.gov.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
To examine the Guthrie photo and the scan made available from whitehouse.gov go to
http://www.teapartypowerhour.com/coding
The “masked” and “unmasked” images of the presumed “copy” are compared to the presumed “original”...
You don’t spend millions on lawyer’s fees to prevent the truth from coming out, unless the truth is bad for you. Obama hides his past like a criminal, because he is one.
Downloading that PDF from the dark lords site and opening it in Adobe Illustrator reveals MULTIPLE layers caused by extensive editing.
If you ever loaded an image into even something as simple as MS Paint and look at a signature you will see the center of the pen/pencil line will be very dark and as you move towards the edges of the line the pixels get progressively lighter.
In one of the edit layers, again from HIS document, reveals a SOLID BLACK line with no graying of the pixels as you look to the edges of the line. IT IS A FAKE AND A VERY POOR FAKE to boot. It takes some time to feather the edges of a signature by manually changing the pixels to a lessor density. BO’s propaganda team were just damned lazy.
Each layer shows different areas of the document being edited. If the political scum had just scanned the BC it would have been ONE layer in the file. I counted more than 20 layers. I guess it is one other skill you don’t have to have to be a community organizer.
What’s weird is that the layers were never flattened before the PDF was made.
No one who manipulates images with Photoshop doesn’t know this.
Someone wanted to leak proof of the BC fraud.
I’m no computer expert...but I’ve seen enough to know that there should be a national discussion about this...and experts need to be brought in who can be trusted.
The national media is giving this issue the UFO treatment...keep laughing at the people who report this...and hope it will go away.
” ... the certified copy she photographed does not match the scan of the certified copy made available for download at whitehouse.gov.
The certified copy Ms. Guthrie photographed is the same certified copy ... posted for download at whitehouse.gov.”
Er, what?
Without having any knowledge of the situation, that image looks strange. My B.C. copy fills up the whole page, and who has a copy of their B.C. that doesn’t? Is that normal?
According to Bill Ego-Rielly the birth annoucement was in the newspaper so that makes it official.
According to some brainwashed relatives of mine the fact that he was elected proves he’s eligible.
What’s with the left-hand side? That doesn’t look right.
Adobe Acrobat creates layers when you make a PDF from a scanned image. It is trying to separate the text from the background to optimize for character recognition.
The BC does fill the original oage, but it was copied onto the larger green paper. You can see the original outline of cert.
The certificate was in a binder, so when they put it on scanner the left side is bent upward toward the binding. Imagine opening a book and placing it on a Xerox machine. The middle will appear to curve away.
You can listen to angry birthers, or you can listen to common sense.
Please point out to us, the exeact times in that 1-1/2 hour press conference where the angry birthers are or don’t you have any common sense?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.