“And my point is that their understanding of what is the actual meaning and intent of the law, is incorrect.”
__
Yes, I understand. You are arguing “correctness” or the lack of it. I am not.
I am simply pointing out that, under currently prevailing law, abortion is legal and President Obama is Constitutionally eligible. I understand that you view both holdings as erroneous, but your view has no impact on what current law actually is.
No more than John Brown's views on Slavery had an impact on what the laws eventually became.
I don't think you understand, we mean to force the laws to change, so yes, our opinions matter towards this goal. I am going to keep repeating that Obama is illegitimate, and that the legal system is full of idiots. (A basic tenet of Conservative doctrine.)
It is you liberal types that have faith in the rulings of Judges because most of the time they can be counted on to rule in an activist manner (authoritarian) such as you prefer.
We know our arguments are having an impact, because "ObamaConspiracy" types keep coming over here to Free Republic to troll against us. If there is no fire, why keep bringing the water?