I am simply pointing out that, under currently prevailing law, abortion is legal and President Obama is Constitutionally eligible. I understand that you view both holdings as erroneous, but your view has no impact on what current law actually is. No more than John Brown's views on Slavery had an impact on what the laws eventually became.
I don't think you understand, we mean to force the laws to change, so yes, our opinions matter towards this goal. I am going to keep repeating that Obama is illegitimate, and that the legal system is full of idiots. (A basic tenet of Conservative doctrine.)
It is you liberal types that have faith in the rulings of Judges because most of the time they can be counted on to rule in an activist manner (authoritarian) such as you prefer.
We know our arguments are having an impact, because "ObamaConspiracy" types keep coming over here to Free Republic to troll against us. If there is no fire, why keep bringing the water?
"No more than John Brown's views on Slavery had an impact on what the laws eventually became."
__
"Eventually became"!! You finally got it!
Now look back at what you were responding to -- it was my comment that "your view has no impact on what current law actually is."
And you seem to agree. You are hoping that the law will eventually become what you want it to be.
And who knows, maybe it will. All I'm talking about is what the law is now -- which, by your own admission, is not what you want it to be, because you said it yourself -- "we mean to force the laws to change."
You admit that current law is against you. And that's exactly what I've been saying.