If you are unarmed and someone approaches you, with apparent ill intent and a weapon exposed or drawn, you're going to attack him to disarm him? You're straining credulity here.
There's a lot more physical evidence and witness testimony to support the "Sweet Widdle Twayvon attacked big meanie George Zimmerman" than the converse.
The fact that George Zimmerman shot Trayvon Martin doesn't automatically make everything he says wrong.
You're showing every sign of being one of Rev. Al's "Useful Idiots".
_____________________________
Straining credulity to suggest that a 17 yo would fight to keep from being shot or to fight to keep the stranger who followed him from pulling the gun? What would you do? Beg or fight?
And, no, I do not believe everything that anybody who has just killed somebody says about how it happened.
Show a statement from a reliable witness that corroborates GZ's version and I'll accept it. Got one? If not then it's nothing but CYA.
And what is it about you guys that you can't discuss the unknowns without name-calling? Do you think that doing so somehow makes your speculation more accurate? sad.