To wit.... “unproven, unobserved theory of evolution”.
All theories are “unproven”. They are all provisional awaiting conflicting data. All theories are therefore “unproven” - once something is “proven” it is not subject to review refinement or rejection - a scientific theory always must be.
As to “unobserved” - that is just idiotic.
If evolution was “unobserved” then last years flu vaccination should be just as good as this years. In fact, there would be no need to update flu vaccinations at all.
Ah, a combo "strawman" and "proof by arrogant condescension" with a half-twist.
I give it a 4, but the Russian judge gives you a 9.8.
Anyone who knows the first thing about the theory of evolution knows that it has been repeatedly disproved by all the evidence available. Evolution is supposed to have happened very slowly over billions of years but actually the fossil record shows that doesn’t happen. The theory of evolution does not even begin to explain the diversity of life on Earth. It’s wrong, plain and simple.
Are you saying that all virus particles are genetically altered to make a vaccine? It seems like that is what you are saying. Since you bring it up I am sure you are aware of attenuating the viral particles with a variety off attenuants...formaldehyde, certain mercury products, heat, etc. Are you genetically engineering all of these vaccines? Some are treated with certain chemical aduvants to augment the immune response in the person receiving the vaccine.
Is this how you support the claim of observing evolution? You are trying to pull a fast one on these readers. That is not fair. There are those who know of this type of sophistry.