Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion

Do you have a theory as to why CJ Roberts swore in Obama TWICE when he surely knew that O was not a NBC? Wouldn’t the place to have stopped all this should have been between the election and the Inauguration?


23 posted on 04/07/2012 4:29:45 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: afraidfortherepublic

I believe he was told if he balked the Soros communist-Islamist alliance would make another run on the bank so he didn’t think he COULD stop it. Same with Dick Cheney. My thought is that both those guys grudgingly played the role they were supposed to because they thought they had no other option - but as they were being dragged away by the witch they left some breadcrumbs for us to follow to show they were under duress.

Dick Cheney never asked for objections to the electoral counts from the states. That’s 50 procedural errors that rendered the declaration of the electoral winner non-legal because it didn’t conform to the requirements of the statute. A technicality that left an opening for a lawsuit to overturn the whole thing if we ever got the gun away from Soros.

John Roberts did what no SCOTUS Chief Justice has EVER done, much less when he knew it would constitute an ex parte meeting in one or more lawsuits - he invited Obama to the Supreme Court. We’re told that’s happened before but the invitation has never come from SCOTUS. The kicker about this is that the news about the invitation being extended to Obama came out on the very day that the SCOTUS was conferring over Donofrio’s case, on Friday. We learned on Monday that they didn’t agree to hear Donofrio’s case, but Roberts made sure that EVEN AS THEY WERE CONSIDERING OBAMA’S ELIGIBILITY the public was aware that they were making arrangement for an unprecedented ex parte meeting - since other cases were pending for SCOTUS to also confer about.

I believe that Roberts was told the threat shortly before the Donofrio conference. If you remember there was the obfuscation and trouble from Danny Bickel, the stay clerk of SCOTUS (very, very similar to what happened in the appeals court for Malihi’s decision in GA). Donofrio’s reaction to all that was that SCOTUS was compromised, since they were made very aware of what Bickel was doing and did nothing to alleviate what they knew had given at least the APPEARANCE of impropriety.

I say Roberts inviting Obama to meet with SCOTUS and making that invitation known publicly on the very day that SCOTUS conferred over Donofrio’s case means that not only did they IGNORE the appearance of impropriety concerning Bickel but they actually deliberately CREATED the appearance of their OWN impropriety. Roberts did. Crumbs on the trail.

Botching the public oath and then having no video to prove that a lawful oath was actually administered may have been Roberts’ way to stomach what he was having to do.

There is no proof that either Cheney or Roberts did what was required to install that impostor as POTUS. Both left a technical “out” in case we could get out from Soros’ threats.

Of course, this is my theory. I can’t prove anything. It would explain what we saw though.


24 posted on 04/07/2012 4:56:23 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson