>>5. Linking Olbermann’s name and goodwill with corporate endorsements without his consent.<<
Corporate response: “Good point keith. You owe us an additional $200K for the damage your name caused us and our advertisers.”
I’m pretty sure that a standard media contract allows a network to use the images as they see fit of those that work for the networks.
I think this may be the last that we see Keith Olbermann.
“You owe us an additional $200K for the damage your name caused us and our advertisers.
You can’t possibly damage a name not worth mentioning and I didn’t even know they had advertisers.