Hawaii doesn’t honor subpoenas from other states. That’s why we need a FEDERAL investigation.
And at this point we know that Hawaii altered their 1960-64 birth index to include legally non-valid records. The logical conclusion from looking at their own statements is that they have also altered the BC#’s for at least Stig Waidelich and Virginia Sunahara. They are refusing to allow anybody to see ANYTHING except easily-manipulable computer abstracts. And they had responded at one point that there was no birth record for Virginia Sunahara in their database even though the printed birth index showed a birth record for her - so at least at that point the database had been changed from what they wanted the public to see.
So.... all that considered, even a certified copy of a birth certificate from the HDOH would mean nothing. They’ve already altered too many records for them to have any credibility. What is needed is the microfilms of the BC’s (at least enough to clarify the BC# problems and to allow forensic testing for the age of the microfilm), the paper records (which can also be tested for age and authenticity), and the computer transaction logs and complete vital records history (which would show any tampering with the computer records).
But if the HDOH won’t even allow Duncan Sunahara to inspect the birth certificate for his deceased sister, you can bet your bottom dollar that they will only allow the above records to be inspected and tested forensically when a duly-authorized federal agent pries them from their cold dead hands.
And that, right there, should tell everybody what I’ve been saying for a very long time: this isn’t about Obama at all. It’s about the rule of law, and whether government crooks can do what they bloody well please without any way for the public to hold them accountable.
Show the original BC that your mama gave you, old, wrinkled, like everyone has in THEIR possession!
But if he dont gotit, he can't show it, but spends money and effort to “clean up” the records. Nothing to see here, move along, forward to communist paradise folks!
“...this isn’t about Obama at all. It’s about the rule of law, and whether government crooks can do what they bloody well please without any way for the public to hold them accountable.”
I would add “...accountable PEACEFULLY.” Thank you for saying what must be said. Very few will even allow themselves to think that way, much less admit it publicly, but it is a conclusion to which I have been forced to acknowledge, and perhaps the only way to begin to correct the situation. Constitution=rule of law. Dictatorship=rule by executive order.
As Butter said, Hawaii has denied Virginia's own brother from getting her BC. He's having to sue the state. Why would someone be denied their sister's bc and that bc is the very one that is suspected of being stolen by Obama? HI inacted a new law a couple years ago about vexatious requestors in that they won't reply to citizens' requests for public information (aka the butterdezillion law). Then Obama's good buddy Abercrombie coincidently gets elected governor and stated his first act would be to find O's bc. However, he goes all flippity-floppity that it's not there one day, the next it is there, the next it's in the archives where bc's aren't kept, and then there isn't a record per say but that maybe it was written in the margin or some such hooey. He's finally shut up about it. HI is now locked up tighter than Ft. Knox and no one is getting anything out of them.