Bloodthirsty “Palestinians” decry "pro-Zionist" al-Jazeera refusing to air Merah’s massacre

Typical sick bloodthirsty "Palestinian" Arab-Islamists 'decry' al-Jazeera as being "pro-Zionist" for refusing to air sadistic racist Arab M. Merah's clip where he executes little 8-year old Miriam Monsonego (on March 19, 2012).

It's a malicious website by "Palestinians" (cheerful happy to propagate with every graphic bloodied kid when terrorists use civilians) who are obsessed with bombastic ridiculous language [including borrowing unrelated WW2 terminology], especially hurting victims of the Holocaust (where 6,000,000 Jews/Hebrews/Israelites were slaughtered for no other "reason" than pertaining to a creed/origin) by laughable comparisons in exaggerating, lying about its [fraudulent] victimhood.

This blood cult is hurt by al-Jazeera banning the gruesome video of this Islamist's hate crime. I guess, meantime, they'll have to be satisify their demonic thirst with 'beheading Daniel Pearl' and other jihadi "holy" Islamic hatred clips.

That these words are being uttered by me shocks me, but good for Al Jazeera for not showing the video.

Call me skeptical but I’m sure there are plenty of people working there who would love to give muslim terrorists this gift of watching Jews die. Knowing though, that they would be held responsible for stirring up blood lust with other terrorists pushed them to the decision.

This story is disturbing in so many ways. From the UN refusing to make a single statement about the murder of Jews simply for being Jews when they have pre-printed press releases on the ready for any real or imagined slight to the so called Palestinians, to the animal who killed innocent children and a Rabbi. France had him on their terrorist watch list since 2008; great watching. Reminds me of our TSA.

Now, the animals father is planning on suing the French police for “killing his son” and has asked a lawyer in Algeria to handle the case for him. He’s also making excuses for his son. Not that we do not see this in the US when a person goes on a shooting spree; many families trip over themselves to make sure the press knows their family member would never do something that horrible, “they must have snapped” of course. This is the same father btw, who has been called “absent” and “out of his sons life” by the terrorists lawyer.

Maybe daddy thinks he’s won a lottery? Gotta pay that lawyer to rehabilitate his son’s reputation after all. In France at least. His son has cemented the families reputation as martyrs and heroes all across the muslim world. Praise be to that pedophile prophet.

Three beautiful children, two of the children’s father, a Rabbi, all butchered for simply being Jewish. Not that France isn’t known for its Antisemitism. Sarkozy to his credit quickly condemned these murders, called it a national tragedy and the terrorist an animal. Yet, he’s loath to admit why three French children and a Rabbi were butchered. Sarzoky ordered Jewish schools across France to have a moment of silence if memory of the victims; can’t have the children in the rest of France do that though. After all, it’s only a few Jews, right?

Sigh....yes, I’m rambling. This story has for some reason bothered me more than most. Not that horrific murders aren’t common in areas where Jews and Muslims live (and 99% of the time it’s the Muslim doing the killing).

I’m thankful the animal was shot like the dog he was (apologies to dogs whom I love) instead of facing French “justice” where no death penalty or true life in prison exists. At least the Jews of Toulouse and France can rest a bit easier knowing this particular walking time-bomb is gone. That is, until the next terrorist decides to prove that allah is greatest.

Allah followers won’t be happy until every single Jew is killed. No, strike that, even then they wouldn’t be happy, all they would do is turn their lust for blood on another group of “infidels”.

Most people are not even aware of the Khaybar massacre...and they should be.
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=16391

This last family of Jews, Banu Kuraiza (reputed to be a family of Kohanim), insisted they had maintained neutrality throughout the campaign. Mohammed hotly asserted that they had betrayed him to the enemy. A fierce struggle took place and the Jews withdrew to their fortress, where they managed to hold out for two weeks. At last, at the point of starvation, they surrendered to Mohammed.
The Banu Kuraiza were all too aware that Mohammed would most likely unleash his frenzied rage against them. At the last moment, however, he offered them life. All they had to do was say, "Mohammed is the Sent One and he is the one whom we find mentioned in our Scriptures." The reply was instant and unanimous: "We will never abandon the Law of our Torah and will never change it for another!"
On the spot, six hundred Jewish men were butchered, and their wives and children taken to be sold into slavery. One particularly beautiful Jewish woman named Rihana, who had just witnessed the killing of her husband, was reserved to be added to Mohammed's harem.
With Medina firmly established as his power base, Mohammed expanded his efforts. Within a few months, his army, by now a swaggering, vengeful horde, swept through the Jewish settlements of the Arabian peninsula. In town after town, the Jews defended themselves bravely, only to fall to the Muslim sword. On one occasion, after a Jewish leader had been tortured and executed, his sister tried to avenge his death by poisoning Mohammed's food. While the poison did not kill him, Mohammed suffered from its effects until the end of his life, four years later. By the time Mohammed died in 632, the Jews remaining in the peninsula were helpless.
Marching under the banner of Islam, the Arab troops spent the next ten years expanding throughout the Near East and northern Africa. Persia and Byzantium, unprepared for the onslaught, were conquered relatively easily. The Jews and Christians were permitted in these conquered countries as guests, grudgingly admitted into the "House of Islam." As Mohammed wrote in the Koran: "A person, on maintaining his Judaism. ..should not be forced to convert. He must, however, pay his head tax. ..in which case he is entitled to Gd's and the Prophet's protection." They were also required to wear distinctive clothing and adhere to other laws that sought to demean them and separate them from Muslim society... Jews and Christians were forbidden to resemble Muslims in their hairstyles or dress...
Chaim Schloss: "2000 years of Jewish history: from the destruction of the second Bais Hamikdash until the twentieth century," Feldheim Publishers, 2002 [ISBN 158330214X, 9781583302149] p. 43

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.