You are correct that no state government would do such a things for the reasons you stated above, but you are overlooking the most likely reason for doing such a thing. Because it is easy and convenient. Nowadays, copy and paste is pretty much the way you would manipulate any redundant text or image file.
Why not show us the original reissued adoptive documents? Its really so simple.
It is ILLEGAL for government officials to disclose adoption information, and it is INCONVENIENT for Barack Obama to do so.
In any case the public docuuments as they are now, indeed are forgeries as Arapio has reported,, but hardly what you might call reissued adoptive state documents.
They aren't "reissued" they are created from bits and pieces of other documents. Barack's lawyers could have petitioned the court to unseal his original birth document, but it was more useful to him to simply have a replacement one issued that supports his narrative. We aren't seeing his ORIGINAL birth document, we are seeing a REPLACEMENT with some of the same information which is on his original birth document.
Again, I repeat that his original birth record is probably going to be an affidavit of "at home birth". It WILL NOT look like a birth certificate, and therefore will call into question whether or not he was really born in Hawaii.
The current forgeries are nothing more than propaganda documents,characteristic of a nationalist socialist regime, acting according to its own “law”, not that of the people.
Yes they are, but they may have also been created legally by the State of Hawaii.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html
Kyle-Anne Shiver writes good articles.
Nowadays, copy and paste is pretty much the way you would manipulate any redundant text or image file. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
In most states “copy and paste” with a government issued document is a felony, whether one is a government worker or not.
In Hawaii a finding of guilt would likely result in a sentence of 2-5 years and / or community service.
Why should the provenance of a president’s birth record include a crime? No Civil Servant worth his little salt would do such a thing unless it were for propaganda reasons, and there was a motive or payment for it.Its easy and convenient for me to committ robbery instead of working, yet I do not do it. I wonder why.
Adoptive birth certificates are indeed reissued in place of the original non adoptive document, under the seal of each respective state, and the original is withdrawn from the record and placed under seal as you say in most cases BUT not so Hawaii in relation to the COLB in question.
Hawaii would have no reason to “forge” is adoptive COLB documents , because each one is issued and printed from information on the Long Form of a birth record signed by the physician present at birth, for example:
“Hawaii does not issue copies of the Certificate of Live Birth, aka, the traditional, long-form birth certificate. What Hawaii issues in its place is the Certification of Live Birth, aka COLB, that is a short transcript of a person’s complete birth record on file — it is only to be given to the person whose name appears under CHILD’S NAME, or to a member of that person’s family, or someone authorized by the person to obtain it.”
http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/obama_government/news.php?q=1227843027
But Obama’s Hawaii COLB was forged as proven repeatedly by forensic experts, just as Arapio has concluded.
Obama’s Hawaii Long Form either does not exist, or it is sealed, or it went off into a dark haole all woogley.It depends on who you talk to on any given day in Hawaii.
Arapio has asked to see the Long Form.Hawaii refused. Now the process has begun so that Arapio will get to see it.
We all await with abated breath, Buahahahahaha!