I want to read this book. However it will only reinforce what I already know.
This is what we finally get for exalting youth over everything. No adults.
“Is There An Imposter In The White House?”
YES!
Hasn't it been said that the Kenyan us just too smart for the masses to comphrehend?
It's our own fault that Dear Leader is stymied in His pursuit of The Glorious Cause.
Yes. I have read that Michelle is really Andre the Giant.
So let's give someone else a chance to be President come election day Nov. 2012.
Really, could a new President do any worse?
It is time to let this I'm-learning-on-the-job Obama go on his way come election day Nov. 2012, because, in my opinion, a new president could not do any worse.
Myself, I'm tired of President Obama's continuous excuse after excuse and playing the blame game when he faces.
Can the United States survive another 4 years of President Obama making excuse after excuse and playing the blame game when it comes to issues like the high, and still growing, gas prices? Yes it can, but it won't be pretty.
Again, let's give someone else a chance to be President. I don't think he can do any worse.
Obama is dumber than donuts, but I don’t fault the guy for wanting the best job he could find. It is the duty and responsibility of the people tasked to hire for a position to select the best person for the job. The majority of American voters have crap for brains. He’s not the first unqualified dipstick I’ve seen hired for an important job. It’s just that we have millions of people in this country who are too stupid ro realize that politics is about selecting the best person for a job and not some kind of crosstown high school football match.
This fits with his reliance on the teleprompter, and how unprofessional he seems without it. The WH insider articles...say the same. He loves campaigning and is why he is out jetting around, but he doesn't seem to like the job. He hates America
Obama is in over his ears.
I wonder if they give any credit to General Sullivan and Colonel Harper, who authored “Hope is Not a Method” in 1997.
I would like to see that videotape of candidate Obama speaking before an Arab/Palestinian dinner in California in 2008, because there are rumors that candidate Obama said some things that would have upset Jewish Americans and Israel itself.
1. If you remember, in 2008 the LA TIMES was given a copy to look at, but the owner told LA TIMES that it could not release it to the public.
2. I believe that the LA TIMES has never released the videotape.
3. LA TIMES' excuse was something like this: It did NOT want to influence the election process in a bad way, whatever that meant.
4. I believe that the LA TIMES was morally wrong to promise the owner that it would not release the videotape after it looked at it.
5. As an American newspaper existing under the law of a free press, it had no right to make such a promise to the owner. It should have told the owner that it could NOT make such a promise. Sorry.
6. For instance, what if the videotape showed Obama to be a great person who praised Jewish Americans and Israel and loved everybody?
7. In that situation, I bet the LA TIMES would have quickly released the tape.
8. And I'm sure that candidate Obama and his staff would have been the first ones to beg LA TIMES to release the videotape, if candidate Obama felt that the videotape would help him gain votes in the Jewish community.
9. Watergate Scandal: And what about the Watergate Scandal that the Washington Post wrote about many years ago during President Nixon's shortened second term administration?
10. Can you imagine the terrible damage to the American people and to world history if the officials at the Washington Post had decided that the story was too hot to release to the public and they did not print it, because they feared that the information would do emotional damage to Americans and to President Nixon and his presidency?
11. I shiver to think what would have happened to this great country if the Washington Post did not have the courage to write about Nixon's Watergate scandal, an incident that turned into much more than just a "third-rate burglary."
12. If LA TIMES would have released the videotape if it was kind to candidate Obama, then it had a journalistic duty to release the videotape if it was NOT kind to candidate Obama.
13. My point is this: It is not LA TIMES' place to tell us what we can read or not read when it comes to what politicians---like presidential candidates---do or not do during their political campaigns.
14. What right does the LA TIMES have to tell us what is good or not good for us? How arrogant is that? What about "truth"? Shouldn't LA TIMES be more concerned about printing the truth about Obama than worrying about whether or not Obama's political future would be hurt by the release of the videotape?
15. If the videotape puts Obama in an embarrassing situation with Jewish Americans and Israel, then so be it.
16. So I say it is time for voters to start putting tremendous pressure on LA TIMES to release the 2008 videotape of Obama,and let us voters decide for ourselves whether or not the information on the videotape is good or bad for Obama.
17. LA TIMES should stay out of the censorship business and do its duty: Release the videotape and let the chips fall where they may. .
America voted for Hope and Change and got Cope with Change instead.
So anyway, Forbes sent this article down the memory hole. Did anyone save a copy?