INS DOC FOUND: U.S. CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO ONE EAST AFRICAN-BORN CHILD OF U.S. CITIZEN IN 1961!

The Daily Pen ^ | Friday, March 23, 2012 | Dan Crosby

[Red Steel]

IMPLICATIVE DISCOVERY: A government document found buried in the online reference section of a Boston Public Library archive bolsters a growing mountain of evidentiary data against Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility to be president. The document indicates that a consular officer issued a single certificate of statutory citizenship, within the time frame including August 4, 1961, to a child born to a U.S. citizen between July 1st and December 31st, 1961 in the Kenyan region of Africa. The record also reveals that the certificate was the only one issued for this specific type of arrival in the U.S. over a span of more than 18 months, among thousands from other parts of the world.

NEW YORK, NY – A recently discovered rare immigration record found by researchers working on behalf of an ongoing investigation into the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama to hold the office of the U.S. presidency reveals that an American consular officer issued a single Certificate of Citizenship to only one passenger arriving in the U.S. from the Kenyan region of Africa between July and December of 1961.

The record shows demographic and status classifications for a passenger who was explicitly recorded at the INS Arrival Inspection Station as an individual being born to a U.S. citizen parent arriving from the Kenyan region of Africa between July 1st and December 31st, 1961.

This information and the dates of its documentation are disturbing given the rare nature of the issuance of certificates of citizenship for children who acquire their citizenship by birth to incoming U.S. citizens in this particular region of Africa.


These dates not only align with the alleged date of Obama’s birth on August 4, 1961, but also with evidence indicating that Ann Dunham departed from Hawaii beginning in February, 1961, shortly after her undocumented marriage to Obama Sr.

Also supported by this data is the implication of an African trip by the absence of Dunham’s passport information which is known to have existed from the 1960s which was used in at least one occasion for her departure with Obama Jr. to Indonesia where the two lived with Lolo Soetoro, Dunham’s second husband. If Dunham had filed for a “renewal” of an old passport, rather than for a new passport in the mid 1960’s for the Indonesian trip, which would have been the common practice for the life of a passport, this would have been indicated on the missing application which would have been included with the series of documents released by an FOIA request in early 2010.

The Immigration and Naturalization Service published its annual Report of the Immigration and Naturalization Service in 1963, for the year of July 1st, 1961 ending on June 30th, 1962. According to information on page 99 of the report the only certificate of acquired citizenry issued based on the grounds of birth to a U.S. citizen abroad was coincidentally also issued in the same time frame during which Barack Obama’s alleged birth date occurred on August 4th, 1961.

http://archive.org/stream/annualreportofim1962unit#page/99/mode/1up


According to the INS, Certificates of Citizenship are issued upon arrival in the U.S. to those who have acquired statutory citizenship (not natural-born citizenship) by birth to at least one U.S. citizen parent within the previous year while that parent(s) was temporarily in another country. COC are notifications provided by the American Consulate Service, via the INS, to individuals born to at least one U.S. citizen abroad in order to provide interim citizen alien status while immigration status is processed and secured. COC are not issued to natural-born citizens or children born to non-U.S. citizen parents arriving in the U.S., nor are COC received through the same process as required for naturalized citizenship, according to the INS.
http://archive.org/stream/annualreportofim1962unit#page/14/mode/1up

A COAC is issued to an arriving child from abroad who is:

- born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one parent with “alien” non-citizen status, or
- born in the U.S. to two alien parents who both naturalize after the child’s birth, or
- born abroad to a U.S. citizen who did not live in (or come to) the United States for a period of time prior to the child’s birth, or
- adopted and is permanently residing in the United States and can become a U.S. citizen by action of law on the date on which all of the following requirements have been met:
- The child was lawfully admitted for permanent residence; and
- Either parent was a United States citizen by birth or naturalization; and
- The child was still under 18 years of age; and
- The child was not married; and
- The child was the parent’s legitimate child or was legitimated by the parent before the child’s 16th birthday (Stepchildren or children born out of wedlock who were not legitimated before their 16th birthday do not derive United States citizenship through their parents.); and
- If adopted, the child met the requirements of section 101(b)(1)(E) or (F) and has had a full and final adoption; and
- The child was residing in the United States in the legal custody of the U.S. citizen parent (this includes joint custody)

As previously reported by Dr. Jerome Corsi of WND and other sources, the void of documented and testimonial evidence accounting for Ann Dunham’s presence in Hawaii between February and early August of 1961 implies that she had reasons to travel to Kenya shortly after her undocumented marriage to Obama’s alleged father in February of 1961. According to the widely accepted but highly suspicious uncorroborated account of events, Dunham would have been at least three months pregnant at the time of the marriage. The only evidence accounting for Dunham’s presence after August 1961 is a transcript of registration to attend fall extension classes at the University of Washington, in Seattle, beginning in late August, 1961.

The previous year’s INS report shows that no other Certificates of Derived Citizenry by birth were issued to anyone arriving from the Kenyan region of Africa between July 1st, 1960 and June 30th, 1961. During this time, the INS recorded 282 alien arrivals from Kenya by air, and three U.S. citizens.

The arrival of these Kenyan aliens is corroborated by the African American Students Foundation Report of Activities 1959-1961 which documents the arrival of the same number of students in the U.S. on September 7, 1960 from Nairobi, Kenya via the second sortie of the Airlift America Project, a project initiated in April 1959 by the AASF and former Kenyan Prime Minister, Tom Mboya, to bring African students from Nairobi to study in the U.S.



Of the 2397 arrivals from Africa who were originally classified by the INS as “Aliens” between July 1, 1961 and June 30, 1962, only one was from Kenya. INS procedures dictate that arrivals under the age of 18 not possessing a U.S. passport are issued “alien” status until the alleged parents of the child are officially issued a Certificate of Citizenry. The Certificate of Citizenry can then be used in conjunction with state birth registration procedures to acquire a birth certificate for the child.

A COC is also considered a primary form of identification by the State of Hawaii in 1961 to prove a foreign born infant’s residency in the U.S. prompting the issuance of a standard Certificate of Live Birth under Hawaii Revised Statute 338-17 which would then allocate the location of the birth to the mother’s residence.

Corroborating data from passenger arrivals of flights entering the U.S. between July 1st, 1961 and June 30th, 1962 indicates this one individual may have been originally classified as an alien upon arrival prior to application for derivative citizenship. The INS report shows there was only one individual who was originally classified by the INS as an alien arriving by air from Kenya. This individual was possibly inspected by INS officers in Hawaii upon arrival at the INS station located within Honolulu International Airport sometime in early August of 1961.



Unfortunately, the report does not give data supporting that this individual was accompanied by a U.S. citizen parent. This may be explained by the disparity of time between being classified as an “alien” in the interim until a COAC was granted and the collection of data for this report’s date of publication.

According to the INS report data, a voluntary birth to a U.S. resident in Africa in 1961, away from the quality of care offered at U.S. hospitals was extremely rare with only eight such cases in more than two years. The rarity of this event would leave an easily referenced recording of the birth abroad. Hawaiian law also specifies that documentation used to issue birth certificates by the Hawaiian Health Department includes certificates of citizenship issued by the Immigration and Naturalization Service upon arrival of children born to U.S. citizens abroad.

[hoosiermama]

SOOOO...Does Barry only know what he’s been told?

Being DA.

[dandiegirl]

So much evidence mounting against BO. Pretty soon it will be too much to ignore. This latest bit is unbelievable.

[Seizethecarp]

“SOOOO...Does Barry only know what he’s been told?”

While Arpaio is doing “Joe Friday” (Just the facts, Ma'am) and claiming that he is not accusing Barry at this time, it is pretty obvious that Barry has colluded in the orchestration of a criminal cover-up of his true birth location and the forgery of his identity documents.

[Brown Deer]

If it linked to the fullsized scans there might be something to this.

It is.

[rolling_stone]

I hope everyone takes a little time to read about or see the movie “I ACCUSE” also known as the Dreyfus Affair

It includes significant cover up by the military, judges, and press of a false conviction. The movie shows the judges refusal to enter into evidence anything of value to the defendant (like birthers) It was a real and dividing part of French history, not unlike what we are going through in the US today. One writer was instrumental in getting the truth out by publishing his accusations and being sued for libel. He lost but eventually won.

Anyone who looks into it will realize that yes, there can be unthinkable conspiracies by persons in power to prevent the truth from coming out. It snowballed and they got deeper and deeper into covering up an original falsehood.

I accuse the US Government (through some of its employees), Congress and the Media of either aiding and abetting the cover up of Obamas records or of being ridiculously incompetent, negligent, or just plain cowards for doing as they are told, turning a blind eye or doing nothing to clear up the controversy.

When is the last time the Media, Congress or Investigators with authority asked President Obama about his birth certificate(other than brave Sheriff Arpaio) his social security card, his draft registration, etc? Or have they? The non action indicates to me a silent conspiracy along with a real one.

Is it not evident that the big media refuses to cover the story and refuses to ask the President pertinent questions? Is that not a conspiracy to suppress evidence and information?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreyfus_affair

[Churchillspirit]

Well done!

Hope this finds its way to Sheriff Joe.

[Brown Deer]

I believe it was Connecticut. Right below MA.

Of course. O'Really says that Barack Obama, Sr. was going to school in Connecticut 12 years after he was kicked out of this country. He reads too much Snopes. ;-)

[Seizethecarp]

“Yes, if Obama was born abroad to a bigamist father, Ann’s citizenship would confer a citizenship on him, even though she was under 18. But this would be citizenship by statute. He would not be a natural-born citizen.”

Barry would not be a “Minor v. Happersett NBC” but only if MvH is upheld as applied to the facts and circumstances of Barry's birth.

Note that Barry's legal team have now moved way beyond MvH, WKA and Ankeny to the new standard articulated in Marguet v. Pillado (9th Cir. 2011) which says that Barry would be NBC regardless of where he was born on the planet as long as he is biologically related to a US citizen at birth.

See my FR vanity thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2857598/posts?q=1&;page=101

[Brown Deer]

That still doesn’t account for the Hawaiian birth certificate - long form or short form

You mean the two proven forgeries? How do you account for them?

[doorgunner69]

bookmark

[egfowler3]

Edge919 already addressed part of your question and I can address part of the other.

I have a younger brother born in the Azores islands while my USAF dad was stationed there in the late ‘50’s. On our return to the USA, and enroute to his next duty station in NM, my parents (although my father was natural born, my mother was an immigrant citizen (making me not a natural born citizen since she became one three years after I was born)) had to stop at a US Consulate in Texas to have his (my brother’s) citizenship naturalized. Until the process was complete he was an alien citizen with the papers that went along with it. After the process completed he became a NATURALIZED US citizen, and only a NUSC.

The key question is, did the mother in this record actually complete the process? If the mother was like some anti-US types, she could have flaunted the process and, on arrival home, just said her child was born on the way home. After all, if her child was a new-born (even recently born can fool some folk) she could say it was born on the way HOME when she arrived at her destination.

[x]

The initial reaction is that that 1 person was Obama.

So, he really was "The One" after all?

But if he were born in Kenya with a Kenyan father, surely he wouldn't be eligible for an automatic certificate of US citizenship.

If he were born overseas wouldn't he have to have two US citizen parents to be considered a US citizen from birth?

At any rate, there was probably at least one American couple living in Kenya whose child would more likely qualify as the "1" than Obama.

[Red Steel]

President would be null and void. (written in 2008)IIRC name was Viereo or something similar.

Dr. Edwin Vieira

An article: - http://www.wnd.com/2011/07/321969/

[nathanbedford]

One might well ask the family of former Sen. Ted Stevens whether they believe in conspiracies.

There is no question that the government is fully capable of committing crimes and doing so for a variety of motivations. It seems to me that we would have to inquire what the motivations of the officials of Hawaii to further such a conspiracy might be. Certainly they would not be directly advanced politically nor would they be directly advanced financially in any way that is now known to us. They might, however, be subject to downside pressures on their jobs and associations. Most likely, their motivation, if it exists, would be a desire to support the first black president because they too are people of color mutually supporting each other in a very diverse state.

Yet, at some point we have to have actual evidence. We have to confirm it, that is prove, as an absolutely indispensable first step that the last certificate is in fact a counterfeit. If that is done I think a conspiracy would disintegrate because it will be exposed to the light of intense public scrutiny.

Recent history demonstrates with absolute clarity that this matter will only be moved forward by the presentation of the most compelling hard evidence. The resistance in the media, indeed the resistance on the part of Republican politicians, will only be overcome by hard evidence. I am mindful of Watergate in which the defense infrastructure which protected Nixon only came to an end with the revelations in the tapes. Even DNA proving perjury was not enough to get rid of Clinton.

How much more will it take to get rid of the historic first African-American president. Therefore, all of this talk about conspiracy and the document that was presented today showing some Kenyan came to America at a critical time, does not advance the matter toward a political solution very far at all. Equally, the courts are reluctant to touch this because they are wary of intruding into "political" questions so they dodge the matter by finding there is no standing.

Both the political and the legal frustrations will continue until hard evidence is produced and all the speculation about conspiracy theories will avail nothing.

[Brown Deer]

This would leave a gap where folks digging into this would now need to look at flights from Kenya to Canada, not the US.

Do you remember the initial speculation that SADO returned through Boston to Vancouver/Seattle?

[nathanbedford]

So, do I have it right, on the return to America there would have been preliminary paperwork which fixed Obama as a "citizen-alien" with the expectation that his mother would have filled out additional paperwork to acquire citizenship status? I would assume that the citizenship status would come not contemporaneously but at some later date?

Would the subsequent paperwork be automatic or would it require input from Obama' s mother to move the matter along. I tend to agree with your belief that she probably did not move the matter along, preferring instead to make an end run through Hawaii system not just for political reasons but because it was easier, cheaper, and quicker.Further, as I understand it,Barack Obama would not have been automatically entitled to citizenship so the Hawaii option would have been even more attractive.

As I understand it, according to today's revelation, Obama would have entered the country in Massachusetts and one would expect that at that airport some sort of paperwork would have been generated. What kind? In the normal course, what would've happened to it? If the files have been laundered by Obama's agents, would they know enough to go after this document?

I further assume that the provisional document generated in Massachusetts probably was not placed into the Hawaiian archive. My guess is that the grandparents generated a certificate of live birth on their own affidavit or application.

Does this make sense from your personal knowledge?

[Political Junkie Too]

Interesting chain. Let me add a thought about a conspiracy.

If a conspiracy occurred, it was 50 years ago when Obama's grandmother used her influence to get his vital records admitted. At the time, it would have been a minor event lost among the routine mundane affairs of a local bureaucracy. To those in the future who look back at it, it would appear at first glance to be in order. To those in the past, it would have been like fixing a parking ticket, nothing to brag about and easy to forget or minimize in thought.

Any conspiracy in the current would be from those who are familiar with the bureaucracy and the normal state of documents in the entirety, and who can then recognize anomolies such as the absence of related documents that should also be present. Theirs is a passive consipiracy, as they were not a part of the falsification of records, but they are silent about inconsistencies found in the records.

-PJ

[nathanbedford]

Makes sense.

[Political Junkie Too]

So, he really was "The One" after all?

More like McCain's "That one!"

-PJ

[hoosiermama]

Thanks RS.