“The unborn person is forced to be a part of it - the part who is murdered.”
I am not arguing against that moral point.
But, until Roe-V-Wade is overturned, conservatives, whether social conservatives or Libertarians, should be united, as Conservatives, on what should be understood as the true LEGAL limits of Roe-V-Wade - abortion is “legal” but just being “legal” does not mean that anyone who does not want to participate in providing it can be required to be part of providing it.
Roe-V-Wade only means its “legal” which only means that yes, if you can find someone willing to help you perform it, it is not “illegal”. That’s it. And that is not a mandate, Constitutional or otherwise, that any individual or organization MUST be part of providing it, against their own conscience.
I think they're united on this trivial point now - I've never heard anyone disagree.