I think they're united on this trivial point now - I've never heard anyone disagree.
“I think they’re united on this trivial point now - I’ve never heard anyone disagree.”
I think some social conservatives, besides rejecting Roe-V-Wade, believe it does not go as far as it does, in terms of what’s legal and protected, and some Libertarians believe the “protections” of Roe go farther than they actually do, sometimes assuming that just because it is legal that medical facilities capable of performing it must do so, if asked, out of respecting the choice of the individual to have it.
Many non-thinking conservastives, of a Libertarian type have been caught up in the language that calls the results of the Roe decision as a declaration of an individual “right”, and some then fail to acknowlegde the “individual rights” of those who fall into the category of persons capable of performing/assisting an abortion - as if medical assistance is a robotized societal public service and only the “rights” of those needing it’s service need be considered. Some “pro-choice” Libertarians I know have fallen into this “populist” notion. I have told them they have lost their Libertarian roots.