Replies

It is interesting to note that the black racist professor who was denied tenure at Harvard, which was the cause of the protest demonstration led by Obama and Bell, was Regina Austin,who would write in 1992 about the “positive significance of black lawbreaking.””

“Central to Austin’s “Advanced Torts” course is her claim that minority status confers the privilege of interpreting the law as one pleases.

As writer Heather MacDonald points out, Professor Austin, in her published articles, has exhorted the black community to reject the distinction between lawful and unlawful activity as the imposed strictures of an oppressive white society.

Austin pours scorn on such “traditional values” as “conformity to the law,” which she insists will “intensify] divisions within the black community.”

Austin has also called on blacks to engage in outright lawbreaking, which she calls “hustling,” but which in fact amounts to any number of acts of thievery licensed by Austin’s demands for social justice. Thus, “clerks in stores [who] cut their friends a break on merchandise, and pilfering employees [who] spread their contraband around the neighborhood,”

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2168

I have long suspected that racist blacks wanted favoritism for their race in criminal law, like when OJ got away with murder, but I did not know it was called “Critical Race Theory” until recently