Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Guggenheim: Only Negative About Obama Is "Too Many Accomplishments" (Video)
RealClearPolitics ^ | March 10, 2012

Posted on 03/12/2012 4:06:20 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

(VIDEO AT LINK)

When asked what the "negatives" are in his campaign documentary about President Obama's first term in office, filmmaker Davis Guggenheim says that "there were too many accomplishments."(continued)

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Politics; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: criticalracefairy; hollywood; maybealittleblow; mymuslimfaith; obama; soledad0brien
Can you believe this?
1 posted on 03/12/2012 4:06:31 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Well, I guess you could say it’s a true statement, however the qualifier is that what are successful accomplishments for BHO are in fact disastrous, damaging, detrimental and damning for the USA, her people and freedom.


2 posted on 03/12/2012 4:24:41 PM PDT by svcw (CLEAN WATER & Education http://www.longlostsis.com/PI/MayanHelp2012.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This is a joke!


3 posted on 03/12/2012 4:25:49 PM PDT by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"Davis Guggenheim says that "there were too many accomplishments.""

Ironically, that's exactly what I'd expect a butt-kissing moron to say.

4 posted on 03/12/2012 4:32:56 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (Burning the Quran is a waste of perfectly good fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Jeez. Watching this is more nauseating than that time I watched the Who Wants Chowder? cutaway on Family Guy.
5 posted on 03/12/2012 4:45:53 PM PDT by Maceman (Liberals' only problem with American slavery is that the slaves were privately owned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maxwellsmart_agent

No, it’s not a joke. Someone actually said that on The Piers Morgan show. Morgan wondered how the guy could say such with a straight face. The guy MEANT it.<<GAG


6 posted on 03/12/2012 4:52:34 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks 2ndDivisionVet.
...filmmaker Davis Guggenheim...
...starting with the Nobel Peace Prize. Whoops!


7 posted on 03/12/2012 5:34:41 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
(Stanley) Ann Dunham Obama signature on the long form birth certificate: It does not look normal to me.

1. The more I look/study Obama's mother's signature on the long form birth certificate---especially when I look at an enlarged or zoomed in signature---the more I believe that it is just not normal.

2. For instance, the signature does not sit on the line.

3. Not only does it not lie on the line, but the very tiny space between the letters and the bottem black line is abnormally the same all along the line except for the "A" in "Ann."

4. Compare Stanley's signature to her signatures on other documents, and you will see that she does what many of us do: She writes on the line and uses the line as a guide to write her name.

5. In fact, in a few instances in the other signatures, Stanley's signature goes below the line, which, in my opinion, is a natural thing to do when one writes his/her name in a narrow space on an application form of any kind.

6. Except for her Social Security application signature: In this signature, Stanley writes her name well in the center of the space, and she does not touch the bottom line or the top line in the space where an applicant writes his/her name, but there is a lot of space between the bottom of the letters and the bottom line, a lot more space than the tiny space between the bottom of the letters and the bottom line on long form birth certificate.

7. I tried this little experiment: I took some writing paper with lines on it and carefully wrote "Stanley Ann Durham" and my own name.

8. I purposely tried to avoid the bottom line on the space on the paper, and I succeeded, but I was trying to avoid the line on purpose. However, the space between the line and the bottom of my letters were much greater than the very tiny space between the bottom of the letters and bottom line that we find on the long form birth certificate.

9. I also found this interesting when I wrote "Ann Dunham Obama": The space between the bottom of the letters and the line was not uniform across most of Stanley's signature that I wrote as it is on the Obama long form birth certificate.

10. Again, look at Stanley's other signatures that can be found on the internet: As far as I could tell, Stanley wrote on the lines and used the lines as a guide to write her name in the space, something that many of us normally do.

11. Nordyke twins' mother's signature: Look at the mother's signature on the Nordyke twins birth certificate: You will see how the twins' mother wrote her name on the line, which is something that many of us would do.

12. The "(Stanley) Ann Dunham Obama" signature on the Obama long form birth certificate seems too perfectly positioned to have been originally written there by Obama's mother, because the great majority of the letters do not touch the bottom line, and the tiny space between the bottom of the letters is too perfectly spaced to have been put there by Obama's mother on the original certificate.

13. My conclusion is this: Stanley did not write her name on the long form birth certificate, because if she had, some or most of her signature would have touched the line, and some of it would even have gone under the line, because that is the way she wrote her name on other documents, and because it is the way that many of us would normally write our names on an application form.

14.In fact, I don't believe that it would have been humanely possible for Stanley to write her name so close to the line without touching the line in several places----or going under the line---- like she touched the line when she signed her name on other documents that we see on the internet.

15. Is the signature a fake? At the very least, it is a very highly suspicious signature.

8 posted on 03/12/2012 5:36:54 PM PDT by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Send me some of whatever this crazy bastid is smoking.


9 posted on 03/12/2012 6:11:03 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson