Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: madison10

Which is worse? Healthcare mandates supported by Newt, or Ethanol mandates supported by Santorum?


15 posted on 03/11/2012 6:06:34 PM PDT by Allon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Allon

Okay...the healthcare mandates are worse. Arrgghhh! I don’t know who to believe.

I still prefer Herman Cain.


18 posted on 03/11/2012 6:09:13 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Allon

The only “healthcare mandate” was that people who did not want to buy insurance would post a bond. That’s reasonable and does not involve forcing anyone to buy a particular product.


23 posted on 03/11/2012 6:14:31 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Allon

looks like Santos was on the individual mandate roll too

http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/1994-report-santorum-supported-individual-mandate/343086


60 posted on 03/11/2012 7:03:31 PM PDT by Fred (http://whenmittromneycametotown.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Allon
>> Which is worse? Healthcare mandates supported by Newt,<<

Do you not understand what Newt was saying in regards to requiring people to be responsible for themselves? He was saying that people needed to have a bond if they refused to have insurance. He is not advocating that the public pay for those who don’t have insurance like Santorum, Romney and Obama. Santorum, Romney and Obama think we need to subsidize the insurance for those who refuse to insure themselves. Newt believes we should require individuals to be responsible for themselves rather than rely on us.

76 posted on 03/11/2012 8:22:07 PM PDT by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson