Posted on 03/11/2012 11:01:54 AM PDT by Starman417
Or, why Soledad O'Brien is so desperate to quash this story
Not long before he passed away, Andrew Breitbart promised a proper vetting of Barack Obama. It began with the publication of the "The Love Song of Saul Alinsky" post at Breitbart.com. Obama was among several left wing radical panelists to speak following the 1998 play. It seems that a video of the discussion exists but the director of the play has declared
There is only one archive tape of the play and I have it, Dickler informed our source. It is not in Chicago.Dickler told our source that she doesnt believe shes ever watched the tape, and she doesnt know if it can be viewed. But she added: No one is going to see the tape.
Naturally, such a decision leads one to wonder why.
Now Breitbart.com has published a 1991 video of Barack Obama embracing Bell and imploring everyone to
"Open your hearts and open your minds to the words of Prof. Derrick Bell."
Professor Charles Ogletree claims
"We hid this throughout the 2008 campaign."
Of course, left wing lamestream media rose as one in full Obama protection mode
From the Week
Breitbart Obama video fails to shock US establishment
The ever-so-predictable Dylan Stableford at Yahoo:
Andrew Breitbart's promised video of Barack Obama's college days at Harvard University was released in full on Sean Hannity's Fox News show on Wednesday nightand unlike the late conservative provocateur's other video hits, this one appears to be a bit of a dud.
David Graham at the Atlantic
A supposedly incriminating clip debunks the myth of insufficient vetting, proves little about Obama, and distracts from more serious issues.
And at HuffPo
If this is indeed the footage in question, it's not particularly controversial.
Nothing to see here, folks, move along. The media is trying the suppress this story, as they suppressed the Jeremiah Wright/Bill Ayers stories in 2008.
Soledad O'Brien reached new heights in journalistic daffiness with her hyper-partisan deflection of this story. And she apparently needed some coaching from her producer to even blather a false assertion. In an interview with Joel Pollak, senior editor of Breitbart.com, O'Brien repeatedly interrupts Pollak as she tries to steer the conversation away from the actual issue. It's fun to watch.
(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net...
Keel Whitey!!!
I watched that interview. It was stunning.
Wow!
doesn’t make any sense — there is no “white race”. There are Caucasians, but they include “dark skinned” folks like Indians and Iranis. Among the “white race” are included Semites like Jews and well there are brown Jews and Arabs..
LOL...love the end of the article “Meet Mrs. Pollock” video..and she is black....Oh...Soledad you ignorant Sl#t
O’Brien seemed drunk.
“doesnt make any sense there is no white race. There are Caucasians, but they include dark skinned folks like Indians and Iranis. Among the white race are included Semites like Jews and well there are brown Jews and Arabs..”
You left out me and my Hispanic kinfolk from South of the border.
Great point, but you'd have to be an anthropologist or someone pretty well-read to recognize that Caucasians are the most diverse race in terms of skin tone. For the ignorant masses, "white" = someone of European (pref. Northern European) descent with a "light" complexion.
Do what you have to do. I will.
No? Well then I guess you'll have to deal with the Irish, Scot, and German parts too. In case you're confused, Professor, were I a dog that would be a mix of Wolf, Wolf Hound, Pitbull, and Rottweiler. When do we start the party?
ok if she won’t show it we can say it’s full of Obamass saying he wants to kill whitey. then she will have to show it to prove he isn’t.
I Am Andrew Breitbart. War.
Plenty of that going on right here on FR.
I have $10,000 I will use to pay for the one way ticket back to Africa to any “african American” who thinks they truly have the dirty end of the stick here in the USA. Just revoke your American citizenship and get the hell out.
Lying turkeys.......
Time to hit the tanning booths...
well, Hispanic kinfolk from South of the Border depends, anthropologically speaking. Most are mixed, mestizo. Some will have only Caucasian blood, but most are mixed. That being said, I think most of us are hardly purely Mongoloid or Caucasoid or Semitic etc.
I usually refer to myself as a mutt but on government forms it’s usually as American or ‘other’.
P.S. It doesn’t really matter where my kinfolk came from, what counts is that I’m here, now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.