Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE MURDOCH MEDIA'S JOURNALISTIC MALPRACTICE
http://youtu.be/mYTbhas31c8 ^ | Scott Ryan

Posted on 03/06/2012 6:00:22 AM PST by publius321

Fox News is once again manipulating the outcome of the Republican primary giving favorable treatment to Mitt Romney by omitting ground breaking story of Mitt Romney's monumental lie about advocating an individual mandate at the Federal level and allowing slanted coverage of their preferred candidate Mitt Romney.

(Excerpt) Read more at youtu.be ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy; Government; Politics; Religion
KEYWORDS: fox; mandate; newt; romney

1 posted on 03/06/2012 6:00:26 AM PST by publius321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: publius321

They put him over the top last weekend. They had the human moment piece with Romney’s response on the veteran question from his father. Maybe it wasn’t contrived, but it conveniently filled a gap. Romney does very poorly on personal appeal and trust. I watched his town hall in Ohio last night on CSPAN. Just dreadful. Then you had Wallace slice and dice Santorum on Sunday. It was the one-two punch. The WSJ did a nice hit piece on Gingrich earlier in the week. Looks like a pattern to me. Well, we’ll see how Romney does. I expect he’ll lose because the other media won’t be carrying his water.


2 posted on 03/06/2012 6:09:30 AM PST by throwback ( The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: throwback

“Well, we’ll see how Romney does. I expect he’ll lose because the other media won’t be carrying his water.”

That is so true. The debate audience will not be stacked with 85% Mormons in Mesa applauding even when Mitt’s taking a breath.


3 posted on 03/06/2012 7:47:46 AM PST by publius321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: throwback
I'm a subscriber to the WSJ, and I'm increasingly suspicious about their editorial content, especially when it pertains to China. They get a lot of advertising revenue from the Chinese, and in return periodically let in some incredible “editorials” by pro-red contributors. In addition, there are often pro-Chinese implants within other articles, and some of the letters to the editor supporting controlled market communist-capitalist practices are just bizarre. We are all being played, my friends.
4 posted on 03/06/2012 11:31:18 AM PST by binreadin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson