Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: grundle

I’d like to believe this however,

1. My first explanation would be the “19” in 1980 simply didn’t get inked, wasn’t pressed down on, was worn, or all three.

2. Yes the “80” appears slightly out of position, but this is a hand loaded stamper and

3. IF you are going to create an “80” why wouldn’t you get the numbers “19” and create a “1980” just like the ones you are trying to duplicate?


40 posted on 03/01/2012 7:45:25 PM PST by Williams (Honey Badger Don't Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Williams

where would you get 19 in 2008?


46 posted on 03/01/2012 8:05:08 PM PST by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: Williams
<1. My first explanation would be the “19” in 1980 simply didn’t get inked, wasn’t pressed down on, was worn, or all three.

So, no portion of the "19" got inked, but the cirle around the outside of the stamp did? And, exactly how would not getting ink on a critical portion of the stamp explain the fact that the "80" is out of alignment with 4 other samples of the same stamp, from the same post office?

2. Yes the “80” appears slightly out of position, but this is a hand loaded stamper and

Because, the "19xx" stamps have been destroyed, like 20yrs ago. So, the forger grabbed what 'was' available in that year - a "2008" stamp (does that year ring 'any' bells?). He cut the stamp in half (and this was his screw up); turned the "08" upside down, and viola you have "80". Then, he hand-positioned the half-size rubber stamp improperly - messing the offsets that the 'real' "1980" stamp would have had, and providing us with evidence of fraud.

48 posted on 03/01/2012 8:13:18 PM PST by Hodar ( Who needs laws; when this FEELS so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: Williams
2. Yes the “80” appears slightly out of position, but this is a hand loaded stamper and

Looking at the stamp, it would seem near impossible to have the numbers "slightly out of position" from the border. The holders for the month, day, and year are fixed. The 80 could be closer to one border or the other if it were placed improperly, but not closer to both.

3. IF you are going to create an “80” why wouldn’t you get the numbers “19” and create a “1980” just like the ones you are trying to duplicate?

Just like the alleged long form birth certificate, the people who did the forgeries were not the best. I doubt that they even considered that the selective service card would ever receive such scrutiny. The fact is that the MSM are not concerned at all about the evidence produced by Sheriff Joe. It is all about political motivation and protecting Obama. The fact is that we know very little about the guy. He was never vetted like other candidates for President have been. Instead, the MSM was willing to accept his two autobiograhies as gospel.

53 posted on 03/01/2012 8:30:16 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson