Posted on 03/01/2012 6:16:37 PM PST by grundle
.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Listen to the two reporters at the end of the presser rail on the motives of Sheriff Joe. They could care less about the findings.
Not at all. Failing to register came with stern warnings about status and citizen benefits. I registered in 1981.
Yep, motive is always assigned to Republicans - never Democrats. Actually they are assigning their own biases to the motives - common for the media.
I registered in 68 but I thought after VietNam people quit worrying about it
I remember it being a big issue. Maybe because it was re-instated recently. Obama would certainly need this document as it was a big issue in 1980.
where would you get 19 in 2008?
Then, you would be wrong.
If you are a man ages 18 through 25 and living in the U.S., then you must register with Selective Service. It’s the law. According to law, a man must register with Selective Service within 30 days of his 18th birthday. Selective Service will accept late registrations but not after a man has reached age 26. You may be denied benefits or a job if you have not registered. You can register at any U.S. Post Office and do not need a social security number. When you do obtain a social security number, let Selective Service know. Provide a copy of your new social security number card; being sure to include your complete name, date of birth, Selective Service registration number, and current mailing address; and mail to the Selective Service System, P.O. Box 94636, Palatine, IL 60094-4636.
So, no portion of the "19" got inked, but the cirle around the outside of the stamp did? And, exactly how would not getting ink on a critical portion of the stamp explain the fact that the "80" is out of alignment with 4 other samples of the same stamp, from the same post office?
2. Yes the “80” appears slightly out of position, but this is a hand loaded stamper and
Because, the "19xx" stamps have been destroyed, like 20yrs ago. So, the forger grabbed what 'was' available in that year - a "2008" stamp (does that year ring 'any' bells?). He cut the stamp in half (and this was his screw up); turned the "08" upside down, and viola you have "80". Then, he hand-positioned the half-size rubber stamp improperly - messing the offsets that the 'real' "1980" stamp would have had, and providing us with evidence of fraud.
Do we have Clinton on tape protesting against the US on foreign soil?
I’m not convinced the numbers “1” and “9” didnt exist for this stamp in 2008. Or that no stamp insert from the 20th century (1900’s) could be found.
I understand the arguments well, it’s just not conclusive.
And yes, hand stamps suck and don’t ink properly all the time. Very common.
I’m 33 and had to sign up in 1996.
Looking at the stamp, it would seem near impossible to have the numbers "slightly out of position" from the border. The holders for the month, day, and year are fixed. The 80 could be closer to one border or the other if it were placed improperly, but not closer to both.
3. IF you are going to create an “80” why wouldn’t you get the numbers “19” and create a “1980” just like the ones you are trying to duplicate?
Just like the alleged long form birth certificate, the people who did the forgeries were not the best. I doubt that they even considered that the selective service card would ever receive such scrutiny. The fact is that the MSM are not concerned at all about the evidence produced by Sheriff Joe. It is all about political motivation and protecting Obama. The fact is that we know very little about the guy. He was never vetted like other candidates for President have been. Instead, the MSM was willing to accept his two autobiograhies as gospel.
fyi old thread see post 97 for other examples of 4 number year stamps
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2131428/posts?page=53
I agree with your assertions. Obama IS a fraud and even the left knows it. That’s why they go apoplectic when they can’t prove otherwise.
I don’t know if it’s on tape but he was in the USSR protesting Viet Nam...as I recall. It wasn’t a secret.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1884984/posts
So if there is any truth to it, how will you then refer to the "birthers"?
Unfortunately not. But it might make it a bit more difficult for him to get re-elected. Even an Axe murderer, or a convicted traitor is eligible as long as she/he is a natural born citizen 35 years old or older, and has resided in the US for 14 or more years.
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
Or a legal resident alien. (Green card holder).
Perhaps, but it is "probable cause to believe", and thus the Sheriff has opened a criminal investigation. To the right judge, this might be enough probable cause to issue warrants for evidence from the Selective Service.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.