Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp; mojitojoe; Danae; butterdezillion

Your argumants are specious. Have you not been reading as much as you have allegedly posted? Adoption is a red herring at this point. Why cling to it? What is your point? It appears to be obfuscation of the real issue at hand: Forgery. Why do you cling so desperately to your own personal theory?

The topic is and will now be forgery.Certainly you must have read Polarik’s opus and those who did subsequent forgery research whose names all are on posts in this thread.

As I said, your motives appear to be very doubtful here.We can’t really let the Orly Taitz gang gain any traction eh?/S

Get past it.

And the REAL investigation is now underway, a probable cause finding has now launched a very comprehensive investigation into the forgery itself. Thats a very good thing.

And those many, many Freepers who have treated the issue as a forgery on the face of the documents at hand are now vindicated.They have helped tremendously to bring the matter forward to this point, in Arizona.


50 posted on 03/01/2012 4:11:48 PM PST by Candor7 (Obama fascist info..http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Candor7
Your argumants are specious.

No they aren't, and my spelling is better. :)

Have you not been reading as much as you have allegedly posted?

Oh, absolutely. Plenty of stuff. I don't recall seeing much writing from you.

Adoption is a red herring at this point. Why cling to it?

Who's clinging? I'm throwing it out there. That is the OPPOSITE of "clinging." :)

What is your point? It appears to be obfuscation of the real issue at hand: Forgery.

Not at all. I'm not claiming it isn't a forgery, i'm suggesting it is a LEGAL forgery.

Why do you cling so desperately to your own personal theory?

Again, who's clinging? Show me where it's wrong, and I'll say "Hmmm... that theory doesn't hold water." So you got something to show me or what?

The topic is and will now be forgery.Certainly you must have read Polarik’s opus and those who did subsequent forgery research whose names all are on posts in this thread.

Oh boy. Am I not writing clearly enough? I'm not disputing that it is fake, i'm just saying that it could be a LEGAL fake.

As I said, your motives appear to be very doubtful here.We can’t really let the Orly Taitz gang gain any traction eh?/S

Get past it.

And the REAL investigation is now underway, a probable cause finding has now launched a very comprehensive investigation into the forgery itself. Thats a very good thing.

And those many, many Freepers who have treated the issue as a forgery on the face of the documents at hand are now vindicated.They have helped tremendously to bring the matter forward to this point, in Arizona.

Okay, whatever. If you can't understand me, I don't see the point of trying to understand you.

65 posted on 03/01/2012 4:47:22 PM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson