Posted on 02/29/2012 7:17:11 AM PST by TexasVoter
Today, you can apparently be born under foreign paternity on a remote, multicultural, migratory island hub way out in the Pacific ocean, move to Indonesia with your foreign, non-citizen step-father, attend school under the name and religious identity of that patriarch, then suddenly reappear back on the island four years later under suspicious circumstances without any evidence of repatriation, and none of these circumstances prompts anyone in our government or media to ever so much as question your claim to Natural-born eligibility.
(Excerpt) Read more at thedailypen.blogspot.com ...
If you think it's so important for everyone to read, why not post the whole thing?
When the state of Hawaii is described as “a remote, multicultural, migratory island hub way out in the Pacific ocean”, and the blog writer has no knowledge of the law (see http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/307/325/case.html), then please spare us the blog ping.
There’s only 1 cookie from Blogger and nothing else.
Nobody’s making money off this one.
The Saint Francis School Foundation (St. Francis Assisi School, Djakarta, Indonesia) is an entity incorporated in the State of Connecticut.
Hey, this topic is stupid, and a waste of time. Isn't that your opinion? Funny how certain of you always seem to find the time to bother with it.
You are either obsessed conservative loons, or agents provocateur.
“The Saint Francis School Foundation (St. Francis Assisi School, Djakarta, Indonesia) is an entity incorporated in the State of Connecticut.”
Interesting! Got link?
Texas huh? And how might members of your family fit into the objectionable category? Seems as though it shares a border with a foreign country.
Do you HAVE a personal interest in this issue? Would it affect members of your family were it decided as my side suggests?
“...strike thier name out.”
It’s amazing how much we are learning as we persevere. Can you offer a source for the instructions for passport renewal which you suggest directs the applicant to identify a citizenship change in this way?
He may know more about History than do you. From MY reading, Hawaii was only given State status as a Trade to the Democrats for agreeing to allow Republican Alaska into the Union. Were it on it's own merits, it likely wouldn't have been a state at all, but would have instead been "a remote multicultural, migratory island hub way out in the Pacific ocean" classified as a "territory."
Do you think that has some connection to the Connecticut SS#?
My theory makes more sense than your presence for any other reason. Why does someone who considers the issue ridiculous spend so much time involved with those who would discuss it?
Occam's razor dude. You are either an obsessed loon, or you have a personal interest in a specific *SIDE* of this issue. Mr. Roger's personal interest is known. Your's, if any, is not. How about stating for the record that you have no relatives which would be affected were citizenship to depend on the Parent's nationality?
If you say so, i'll consider the matter settled. While I think you're a kook, (or an interested party) I do not suspect you of being a liar.
“Do you think that has some connection to the Connecticut SS#?”
Yes. Obama returned to Hawaii and lived with his grandmother who had been nominated as his guardian. Legal custody of Obama was maintained in Connecticut until the age of majority. Permanent Resident Aliens are eligible for a SSN.
Is Hawaii a state, and was it so in the 1960s?
Yes. Just as much a state as Iowa, Virginia or Utah.
“The law you linked is about how difficult it is to lose your citizenship and that no one can lose it for you. The author never said this happened.”
“then suddenly reappear back on the island four years later under suspicious circumstances without any evidence of repatriation”
Repatriation means to return to the land of your citizenship, so if Obama returned at age 10 without repatriating, it meant he had lost his US citizenship while in Indonesia.
“I found the blog accurate in all the things that I have knowledge of.”
Hmmm...you mean like quoting from the 1797 translation of Vattel as if it was available during the 1787 convention?
Hawaii became a state in 1959. Only two years later Obama is born there (supposedly). Hawaii is still in transition from a remote, multicultural, migratory island hub way out in the Pacific ocean, to a state, with goofy laws that allow anyone, no matter where they were born, to become a citizen of Hawaii, thus a citizen of the United States. Obama may have obtained his Hawaiian birth certificate (if he even has one) in this manner.
“Mr. Roger’s personal interest is known.”
Really? What is it?
I’ll give you a hint: I think birthers are delusional...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.