Posted on 02/27/2012 5:39:54 PM PST by Flotsam_Jetsome
Ms. Taitz:
As we previously stated, you have made multiple defamatory statements about Larry Klayman and some supporters, including us, causing severe harm. We supported you for years, because you were about the only game in town, after Apuzzo and Donofrio concluded that the federal courts would not hear any argument, no matter how logical, how grounded in fact and law.
Now, there are many ballot challenges granted instant “standing” and new attorneys are joining the fight. Obama State Ballot Challenge has helped to focus attention on the challenges and facilitate activity. We do not appreciate your non-productive infighting with other patriots in the movement. In fact, you are actively and maliciously attempting to hurt our efforts, in a manner nearly indistinguishable from that of the “Obama” forces. We know that they are enjoying sitting back and watching you do their work for them.
We had stayed quiet and counseled others not to get involved in the fray with you. George tried speaking to you twice earlier and again on 2/23/12, but, you would not even allow him to complete a sentence without interrupting. But, you have crossed into libelous action, so it has come to this and now we must reluctantly speak out. It’s bad enough that you routinely attack movement patriots, but now you are damaging the efforts of one of the finest attorneys in the nation. And that is unacceptable. Unlike others you have bulldozed, we will not be so passive, especially since you have ignored letters from our attorney.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
Quite a dustup.
Orly would rather be in the headlines than win
My experience with Orly Taitz, in person, in electronic exchanges, and through observing her court performances and interviews on video, all lead me to conclude that she can best contribute to this effort as a resource in support of more experienced attorneys. Her communications style needs to be more like a drinking fountain and less like a firehose, but that apparently is not part of her personality and skill set.
Dr. Taitz - Thank you for your fortitude and perseverence, but please stand down for the good of the cause you espouse.
Fighting over money among other things. I wonder how lucrative the eligibility business is?
That would be unfortunate, but cannot be ruled out. For myself, I'd rather win, and watch the headlines write themselves. :)
According to a reputable source “there is a sucker born every minute.”
“Never give a sucker an even break”
“This way to the Egress.”
After reading the whole article, etc., I wish to submit a few personal thoughts. I know very little about Ms. Taitz. She may be as crazy as the proverbial “outhouse rat” for all I know. But she HAS actually been lodging legal challenges to Obummer’s eligibility. That’s more than Klayman has done!
For years now, I have received occasional financial appeals from the Klayman organization, touting what all they were doing and “planning to do” to set the Nation aright once more.
I may have overlooked something, but to my knowledge, Klayman’s outfit has not done squat to ACTUALLY make a legal challenge to Obummer in any form or fashion; and precious little else, either! The name of the outfit: LEGAL WATCH, to my mind, is an accidentally accurate name. So far, all they seem to have done is sit on the sidelines and WATCH!
A brief excerpt from the Klayman rebuttal to Taitz is very telling in light of the fact that after 3 years of the Obummer regime, they have still DONE NOTHING! Here’s the excerpt, and I rest my case upon it.....
“Klayman is planning strategy, researching statutes and looking for appropriate jurisdictions to file additional complaints in.”
IMHO, if they haven’t gotten their act together yet after 3 years, and are still “planning strategy”, etc., the chances of them EVER ACTUALLY DOING SOMETHING CONCRETE are slim and none. And “Slim” just rode out of town....that leaves NONE!
I am with you but I have watched her turn things into a circus and get booted every where she goes. She taints every case and gets declared vexatious and is then forced to submit suits before they can be filed. I am not impressed. I think she started with good intentions and the right idea but has turned into someone who has lost their mind
Thank you for your insights. This is exactly why I posted this.
I myself have donated to Orly in the past, and with the level of vitriol being thrown around amongst some of the principal actors (including by her) in the eligibility challenge drama, I was hoping to get the opinions of varied folks on not only who they believe have been and are doing the heavy lifting, but also which parties and tactics would appear to have the best chance of success in getting to the truth. That is, after all, the whole point, is it not?
There was a lot of dicussion and questioning of motives/motivations in the comments section of the ORYR piece, and I was hoping to get a likely more cogent string of opinion here, where comments don't start with "Anonymous" as they so often do at ORYR.
No, something just isn't kosher with these latest antics of hers and it diminishes any credibility and respect I had for her.
JMO and YMMV.
Ping to timely replies.
If by timely you mean IATS (In After the Shutdown). ;)
I’m formulating a response to #113.
Article, and comments # 1 through # 13.
Thanks, philman_36.
I've been doing a good amount of reading on this tiff also. And material being thrown from both parties (the parties being Orly and pretty much anyone else that tries stealing her fire) and am rapidly coming to the conclusion that one of the following applies:
a) She's a genuine, yet quixotic crusader who is determined singlehandedly to bring down the illegitimate regime, thus shining the spotlight of truth on the cockroach-infested pit that is our very highest government. And of course become (more) rich and metamorphosing to famous from merely infamous. She even tried to pry her way into the work of Sheriff Joe's posse. Her ego could be as big, or bigger, than Barky's.
b) She is a crass opportunist of the lowest order, making big bucks off earnest, yet (at some point in time at least) naive people by selling them hope and stringing them along with failure after failure after failure, knowing all the while that they would go nowhere by design.
c) She's a Ringer.
This has been rattling around in my head for awhile, now. For the purposes of "Pick the Target, Freeze It, Personalize It and Polarize It," Orly would fit into the category of you couldn't order a better ridicule magnet for the "birther" movement than this character. Or could you? Order one, that is.
At the very least, Orly needs to accede to a supporting, rather than lead actor role in the current drama, especially the ballot challenge efforts, if she wishes to allay the, in some cases deep concerns about her behavior on the part of some folks following this issue who are alarmed by the drama.
IMHO I think she is generally a good person and passionate about freedoms and liberty, she has first had knowledge of how those can be taken away. I have met her on two occasions. She suffers from ADD big time but aside from that I don’t get the vibe there is more to Orly than shat we see. She is not making any money from this at all, she was the one who got sheriff Joe onto this in the first place. My concern is Corsi has had his nose in this sheriff’s investigation from the get go. So I would be surprised of Joe has nothing more than what Corsi has been peddling for the last few years.
INFIGHTING—I’m shocked!
Larry Klayman is what Jessie Jackson or Al Sharpton would be if they had a law degree
Larry files high profile pleadings, then solicits donations for his legal services and off the top of my head has never won or concluded a case ... not even when he sued his Mother
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.