Boehner must be feeling the heat. He gets a "hunting buddy" to vouch for him. "Is this an accident?

Sipsey Street Irregulars ^ | 2/23/12 | Dutchman6

[Nachum]

"Boehner allegations fast & furious, but also false."

When I first came across these allegations, I was confident they were not true. I have hunted with John Boehner; had in-depth discussions with John concerning our Second Amendment rights; studied his politics; and have a clear understanding of how he views our God-given right to keep and bear arms. With all this in mind, I called his office to inform him of what had been published about him, in relation to the House Oversight Committee's Fast and Furious hearings. I also asked for some information to share that would help my fellow Second Amendment activists understand his position on Fast and Furious.

I've said it before and I'll say it again, while some people have exaggerated what I wrote, even without attribution, as far as what I wrote, I stand by my sources.

As another long-time student of the politics of gun-control and the GOP told me, "Look, Mike, I don't have your sources, but a second-grader could figure out two simple facts. First, that the GOP leadership has been intimately involved with decisions on the focus, direction and speed of the Issa committee's investigation from the very beginning. They wouldn't be 'leadership' if they weren't, especially on something this politically dangerous to Obama and the federal regime. Second, the investigation has not vigorously pursued all the clues that it has itself admitted that it had in the various letters to Holder, etc. . . . (and) that it has recently slowed down. Is this an accident? Is Boehner not in communication with Issa and making political calculations constantly about where this is going? . . . Only an idiot would think so."

[Nachum]

Full title: Boehner must be feeling the heat. He gets a "hunting buddy" to vouch for him. "Is this an accident? Is Boehner not in communication with Issa and making political calculations constantly about where this is going? . . . Only an idiot would think so."

[Nachum]

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/

[pabianice]

I feel bad for the Tea Party freshmen in the House. They have been neutered by the Country Club Pubbies. I wonder how many will even run for re-election. The R Party will be gone in 2016.

[struggle]

I’m thinking they’re holding this down until July/August.

The *BOOM* right before election season when everyone starts paying attention.

[ZULU]

What allegations?

Is Boner anti-gun as well as a stupid dupe??

[NativeSon]

I hear Dick Cheney is looking for a new hunting buddy

[nomad]

Really, this post makes about as much sense as backwards static.

[nomad]

Really, this post makes about as much sense as backwards static.

[Yankee]

When are these imbeciles going to realize that the Second Amendment has nothing to do with “hunting”.

Obama has used the “hunting” ruse too.

All that means is that they can advocate laws banning any weapon that they deem to be not a “hunting weapon” and still claim some phony fealty to the Second Amendment.

[TigersEye]

. . . Only an idiot would think so."

Well, that's real nice, Dutchman6, but the allegations you're alluding to are very big and very dark. Excuse me if I think that 'anonymous sources = no sources' the same as when the Clinton machine constantly came up with anonymous sources to smear the right.

You may have the absolute, undeniable God's honest truth in your hands but until the day you slap some evidence on the table it's still just an opinion from an anonymous source and you can feel free to sling all the ad-hominems at me that you want to.