How do we get this ruling overturned? We can’t have precedent like this. This is how Britain is being taken over; all it takes is a few precedents from local Muslim areas and the whole system is corrupted.
I am dead serious. How does this ruling get overturned? It is the critical business of every person in this country to see that this ruling gets overturned.
And how do we get this judge impeached or removed from office for violating the oath to protect and defend the US Constitution?
If Muslims are going to be too ignorant of American law to know not to attack/kill/behead “infidels”, then this is justifiable reason for us to refuse to allow Muslims to immigrate here. It would not be an exclusion based on religion but upon the ignorance that is their very “essence”. At least according to what this judge said.
Here’s something the user WhupTdue on Jihadwatch wrote about that:
“A commenter under the nic “Brandy” posted the following information about this incident at Atlas’s thread on this topic:
Pennsylvania judges may be removed in one of two ways:
•The judicial conduct board investigates complaints regarding judicial conduct filed by individuals or initiated by the board. The board determines whether probable cause exists to file formal charges, and presents its case to the court of judicial discipline. The court has the authority to impose sanctions, ranging from a reprimand to removal from office, if the formal charges are sustained.
•Judges may be impeached by the house of representatives and convicted by two thirds of the senate.
I believe this is where to file or send complaints:
Wanda W. Sweigart, Court Administrator
wanda.sweigart@pacourts.us
phone: 717-772-3771
The Court of Judicial Discipline of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania Judicial Center
601 Commonwealth Avenue, Suite 5500
P.O. Box 62595, Harrisburg, PA 17106-2595
Phone: (717) 772-3771 • Fax: (717) 772-3774
“
It is becoming more evident to me that the Second Amendment is going to be the only recourse.
I just watched at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bf11F3y9LOE&feature=youtu.be and that claims that the judge also threatened to have the atheist victim jailed if the tape was released publicly, so this judge knows that his decision was wrong and is not only willing to tolerate the defendant’s methods of harassment but as a Muslim himself is willing to use the power of his position to LEGALLY harass the victim.
The judge was a US soldier in a Muslim country (can’t remember whether it was Iraq, Afghanistan, or both). He is a Muslim himself. He claims that there would have been a bigger altercation if the defendant had really wanted to harass the victim. He claims that the testimony of the plaintiff and the defendant contradict each other on the issue of intent. The Muslim says he just wanted the taunting to stop.
Muslims need to learn what the rest of us have had to learn: if you can’t handle the taunting you need to leave. And then you need to defend what you hold sacred through non-violent means.
I think what the judge is saying is that this is tantamount to a bully who is extremely provoking another person and gets what they have coming to them. Like Fred Phelps holding a sign at a funeral saying that the one who died will rot in hell because they didn’t hate gays. An emotional time, with extreme provocation, and the family of the fallen soldier would be justified to try to make the harassment stop.
I agree that this taunting behavior is ugly and I’m sure it makes people in other countries dislike us. But every kid who has ever been bullied on the playground has had to learn how to handle other people who disrespect them.
In Muslim countries they handle it by cutting off the other person’s head. Maybe it’s actually good for Muslims to find out how it feels to be on the other side. If this Muslim man had not just been mocked, but had actually been beheaded or executed by the atheist simply because the Muslim disagrees with atheism, THAN the Muslim man would have known what his people have been dishing out all along. This man is indignant over somebody wearing a costume in mockery of his belief but has no problem with people being BEHEADED for simply abandoning Islam. And the judge sided with those crocodile tears. Disgusting.
If we make mockery of another person’s very essence a justifiable reason to attack them - to get the mockery to stop - then every one of us conservatives would have justification to “silence” everybody in the media and nearly everybody in the democrat party. Rulings like this could easily come home and bite this judge in the butt...
The DA/Prosecutor would have to appeal to a higher court.