Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/23/2012 5:10:36 AM PST by Reaganite Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ken5050

Personal *ping* service

Get signed up for yours by FReepMailing me...
‘Reaganite Repubican’

TIA


2 posted on 02/23/2012 5:13:30 AM PST by Reaganite Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican

I sometimes wonder if Sarah Palin has anticipated a brokered convention, and if so, is she lying in wait.


4 posted on 02/23/2012 5:19:47 AM PST by Rennes Templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican

Make that “bonfire of the vanity.”


5 posted on 02/23/2012 5:19:58 AM PST by Lady Lucky ( Exposure to the Son may prevent burning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican

The authors bias is so readily apparent that one can hardly take him/her not one bit seriously. Santorum could have shined like a diamond and this writer would have only seen a chunk of coal.


6 posted on 02/23/2012 5:21:46 AM PST by Ron H.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican
Did we watch the same debate ?
I admit Rick stumbled a bit on procedure,
but It was ROMNEY who had an epic fail!
Romney kept trying to steer every question into an MSM enabed food fight, often (and transparently) going way off topic to do so.

Mitt needs to drop out now.

11 posted on 02/23/2012 5:29:41 AM PST by SecondAmendment (Restoring our Republic at 9.8357x10^8 FPS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican
How many times can we be asked to take a bite of the Newt apple and keeping coming back for more? Just because the name of State changes does not mean his flavor has changed. One day it taste like it is caramel apple. The next day it is just an old sour apple. You never know which apple you are biting into. I am at the point that I just don't want to take a bite of that apple again no matter the flavor.

That mean, based upon this process of elimination, we are left with Romney. Plane and simple! And, that does not excite me. Why? How excited will voters be to support the guy with has a great “Oppo Man” but has the same governing background as the One? Not very.

Unlike Mclame, Romney may fight the One, but the voters will stay with the devil they know instead of the one they don't.

That means we will get a liberal SCOTUS. That means more regulations. That means we will get even more crony capitalism. That means in 4 years we will become Greece, because this government can not help itself when it comes to mature governance. We will be in so much debt we will die just as other republics have in the past.

So enjoy the horse race we all call a campaign because the finish line will suck for everyone with Romney in the saddle.

12 posted on 02/23/2012 5:29:51 AM PST by vg0va3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican

Last night Newt did a good job. Much better than in the last two debates when he was the guy being ferociously attacked. It kind of works like that.

Santorum had a bad night. It is always harder when you have to spend the whole debate on defense rather than making good points. But..I am sure Santorum knew it was coming. It is hard to fight when the moderator and two of the debaters are pummeling you from every direction. That said, Newt was not the one doing the attacking.

All in all, Romney held his own and the outcome will help the Myth more than anyone else.

Santorum will drop some, Newt will rise some, but will either now be able to top Romney and his horse boy Ron Paul?

Me? I am not going to participate in insulting Newt or Santorum at this time. It is pointless.


13 posted on 02/23/2012 5:31:30 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican
Wow, this writer is definately hijacking a name, huh!

Reagan was ProLife...seems this writer could not care any less about being ProLife. How can he call himself a “reaganite” and be so ProRomney who supports abortion, euthanasia, infanticide, eugenics, genocide and assisted-suicide, healthcare rationing, etc? And then be so anti-Santorum, who is the only candidate who is 100% ProLife and during a campaign where the ONLY thing that will save this nation is full respect for the dignity of the human person and Judeo-Christian principles and constitutional protection of religious liberty? Oh, I get it...he/she's a “Nancy Reaganite.”

Go figure...

14 posted on 02/23/2012 5:34:15 AM PST by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican

It’s no shock to those of us that didnt buy into the “anointed candidate from Jesus” bandwagon attitude Ricks people have been putting out.

They spent so much time projecting greatness on this guy that they failed to remember that all projections need a big blank sheet to go on.

And boy Rick is one of the biggest blank sheets out there.


15 posted on 02/23/2012 5:34:42 AM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican

Romney wins the award for least sincere and least conservative.


18 posted on 02/23/2012 5:39:38 AM PST by reasonisfaith (Or, more accurately---reason serves faith. See W.L. Craig, R. Zacharias, Erwin Lutzer, and others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican

CNN last evening and FoxNews this morning are indicating that last night’s debate may be the final one for the GOP primary season.

The question is whether Gingrich can capitalize on Santorum’s weak debate showing. If Gingrich’s numbers do not soar as today’s polls come in, he becomes the huck-hanger-on.

Romney may have managed to improve his showing and squeak out a win in Michigan.

Santorum’s Big Mo may have been daunted by the debate.

But, for Gingrich, he MUST show a win in at least one state before SuperTuesday. Without that, he falls further behind in the delegate count. Even if Santorum and Romney split AZ-MI, that doesn’t help Gingrich, especially since Gingrich is struggling in GA.


24 posted on 02/23/2012 5:45:47 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican
A pretty good summary of the reviews I've heard this AM.

I've already decided I won't vote for Romney based upon his underhanded trashing of Newt in Iowa and Florida. Santorum isn't ready for primetime. Ron Paul makes sense one minute and scares the hell out of me the next. I'm still a Palinista but Newt has impressed me in all of the debates. He's the only one who lays out his plan in detail. And it's a plan Sarah would be proud of.

Newt's CPAC speech transcript

42 posted on 02/23/2012 6:18:01 AM PST by McGruff (Go Newtclear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican

You are ridiculously over the top. White bread? With Romney sitting next to him you think RICK is white bread?


43 posted on 02/23/2012 7:05:14 AM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican

LOL! That ought to get the “juices” flowing around here!


55 posted on 02/23/2012 8:23:46 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson