Posted on 02/17/2012 9:22:14 AM PST by Oldpuppymax
The Liberty Legal Foundation has filed an appeal with the Georgia Superior Court in the case of Weldon v Obama, one of the three Georgia lawsuits claiming Barack Hussein Obama to be Constitutionally ineligible to serve as president of the United States or to be included on the Georgia ballot. (1)
It is perhaps significant that the very act of filing the appeal was fought by the Superior Court clerk’s office which claimed that an additional $2 fee had not been included with Liberty Legal’s paperwork for the filing of separate motions.
Additionally, the Court Clerk invented numerous excuses to prevent the filing, moving from one to the next whenever it was pointed out by Liberty Legal attorneys that none reflected normal court operating procedure. According to Liberty Legal attorney Van Irion, the clerk’s conduct was, in the course of his entire legal experience, “unheard of.” (2)
As a side note, although the paperwork had been provided some 7 days earlier, the clerk’s office failed to inform Liberty that there was a problem. The clerk simply “sat on the petition” and the filing deadline of TODAY would have been missed had Irion not called to make certain the filing had taken place!
The appeal itself is based upon the claim that the “rights of the appellant [had] been prejudiced because the finding of the Secretary of State (was) affected by…error of law.” (1)
That is, Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp, who approved Judge Michael Malihi’s Administrative Court decision, had done so in spite of (or due to) mistakes of law made by the Judge in deciding the case.
As Irion states in the appeal, the decision of the Judge “not only violates…
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
Can't you read?
Looks like he accepted their evidence but rejected their arguments.
So what does “considered” mean in Section II?
It applies to Orly’s case. He disposed of her vase in section I and the other two in section II.
So what does “considered” mean in Section II?
He accepted their evidence showing that Obama was born in Hawaii. Which was the only point of law he had to consider.
So what does “considered” mean in Section II?
I can’t paste links right now but if you Google “common law system” you will see several links that answer your question.
Btw - the other legal system I mentioned is called the Civil Law system.
I'm not looking up a thing. You made the claim so you support it.
So what does “considered” mean in Section II?
Irion submitted Obama’s BC and stipulated that Obama was born in Hawaii.
@III. Welden’s Case
Where?
Ok - it will have wait about 4 hours.
Where?
Page 3 in the evidence section.
So what does “considered” mean in Section II?
This birther stuff is crazy. You do know how wacko that makes Republicans look to Americans? I read that the State of Hawaii sent to the Judge a certified copy of the long form birth certificate. Case thrown out, like others.
He’s a natural born citizen, according to the laws of our nation, that we all follow. He’s the President. Move on to defeat him in the fall (pun intended). This argument is nowheresville and makes the people who say it look out of touch with reality.
Are you arguing that he submitted invalid evidence to support his case? If he didn’t think the BC was accurate why did he submit into evidence?
So what does “considered” mean in Section II?
I just assumed many others reading this would take the 5 seconds to Google it. This is not a private conversation after all. They have seen the proof and eventually so will you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.