[Thorliveshere]

If those votes were for Mitt Romney do you think the R-e would be hiding them?

The Ron Paul people are just applying logic here.

You do realize there are two other candidates other than Mitt and Paul, don't you?

[opentalk]

Just guessing the hidden votes are for Paul, why hide the results. Very corrupt regardless. It impacts candidate's fund raising.

[butterdezillion]

The other candidates weren’t close enough for it to make any difference if the “lost” votes were for them, so the R-e would have no reason to hide them. The only reason for hiding them is if they would show Romney not to be the winner, and the only votes that would do that would be Paul votes.

The R-e hiding these votes is basically an admission that they were Paul votes, logically speaking.

[butterdezillion]

The other candidates weren’t close enough for it to make any difference if the “lost” votes were for them, so the R-e would have no reason to hide them. The only reason for hiding them is if they would show Romney not to be the winner, and the only votes that would do that would be Paul votes.

The R-e hiding these votes is basically an admission that they were Paul votes, logically speaking.

And the fact that the people in the areas where the votes were taken are hopping mad about it - mad enough to censure the R head - says they also know who those votes were for.