[Harlan1196]

Georgia does not have a legal definition of NBC - it is a Constitutionally defined term. To determine if Obama was eligible, the judge had to look at case law outside of Georgia.

And while Ankeny may not be law, the core of Ankeny is law - the WKA Supreme Court decision. Pick your poison - you still end up at the same place.

Lets not forget that the legal burden of proof was: “more probable than not.” If Orly had not botched her case so badly, then perhaps some doubt could have been cast on the birth certificate. But all the judge had was a plaintiff provided BC and a stipulation of fact.

The plaintiffs should have accepted the default judgment.

BTW - you keep saying that the BC needed a raised seal on it as required by the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the US Constitution. Can you cite some actual regulations or case law?

[Brown Deer]

you signed up and said it was a done deal, then made a couple other meaningless posts in a couple other threads, and then started arguing with others in total contradiction of your first post...

[butterdezillion]

I’m waiting for answers to 4 specific questions that you’ve been avoiding like the plague.

[El Sordo]

“...it is a Constitutionally defined term.”

I’ve got to take issue with that statement. The term is not defined in the Constitution. A rather large part of the problem here regarding BHO is the lack of a clearly defined legal understanding of the term.