One other point: If Irion had presented a Kenyan BC it would NOT be a legally contested “fact”, because nobody at that hearing would have contested it. It would be an admitted fact, that the defendant had admitted by not refuting it. That’s the danger of not showing up to a hearing.
So if an online image of a Kenyan BC had been admitted as evidence it would be UNCONTESTED evidence, just like Orly’s evidence was UNCONTESTED.
So if Irion had presented the uncontested evidence of an online Kenyan BC, what would Malihi by law do with it, and why?
The Judge does have the right to use simple logic as to the fact that the on line BC was not at all harmful to Obama’s position.
If a Kenyan BC or any other controversial document had been entered into evidence, I am guessing that the Judge would have handled such a controversy differently, but we will never know.
Here, there was no controversy, but a stipulation. Orly is not a very good attorney.