So I am not a patriot for disagreeing with you? Really?
So my 20 years of military service means what to you?
You are being questioned (not mocked) because you have been consistently wrong and you clearly lack an understanding of how the legal system and state bureaucracies work.
When you fall back on a massive conspiracy that encompasses the entire legal system and both political parties then perhaps there is less to your arguments then you think.
Have you ever once sat down with an experienced lawyer and talked to him about this?
I never said you weren’t a patriot. I said that the people who are not accepting the BS are patriots. I’m sure that there are people who don’t know they are accepting BS who believe that the way they are behaving is patriotic as well, and if motivation is all one considers they would be considered patriots as well. Deceived patriots, but patriots. The net effect is the same as if they were enemies, and that is why deceit is such a blight on a people. It neutralizes the well-intended people by making them believe that good is evil and evil good.
Those who have seen the truth and still support the deceit are worse than enemies.
You’ve pre-judged that a conspiracy couldn’t happen. Just like Malihi pre-judged that one of the conflicting internet images can’t be a forgery. But I’m not like Malihi and I’m not like you - because I operate with an evidence-based epistemology. If the evidence points to conspiracy then I am inclined to believe the evidence. If the evidence points to forgery then I am inclined to believe the evidence.
You can find a lawyer who will tell you anything you want to hear on this particular issue. Mario Apuzzo is an experienced lawyer. Mark Hatfield is an experienced lawyer. But then so are Obama’s lawyers.