Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rick Santorum speaking at CPAC now, Newt Gingrich next
CSPAN ^

Posted on 02/10/2012 1:15:06 PM PST by iowamark

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: petercooper
Do you ever support a candidate or do you just make a specialty of tearing them down. Every candidate running has flaws. Ron Paul is the worst IMHO and Santorum is the best IMHO in terms of positions. Gingrich & Romney are tied for worst in terms of electability and Santorum is the best IMHO.
41 posted on 02/11/2012 6:30:00 AM PST by GulfBreeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: GulfBreeze

“Gingrich is damaged goods and has been.”

As though Santorum or anyone else is a perfect angel??


42 posted on 02/11/2012 9:57:44 AM PST by CodeToad (NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

“Thank you. I am so tired of these people tearing down our candidates. I’m tired of the “my candidate or I won’t vote” tantrums.”

How odd that you thank him. He torn down everyone but his candiate Santorum.


43 posted on 02/11/2012 9:59:31 AM PST by CodeToad (NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: GulfBreeze

“do you just make a specialty of tearing them down”

Like you did to everyone but Santorum?? Do you ever pay attention to the words you type? Obviously not.


44 posted on 02/11/2012 10:01:17 AM PST by CodeToad (NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Do we really need this clown here tearing down every candidate but his own?


45 posted on 02/11/2012 10:02:52 AM PST by CodeToad (NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: GulfBreeze
"You’re looking at a mirror. You go look what I wrote. And look at some of the crap you wrote while you’re at it. (BTW, I meant to be insulting. I get tired of folks like you who think they can be smart alecs and rude and insulting and then cry like little girls when they get it back.)"

Ahh, the old "I know you are, but what am I" argument. What are you, like 12 years old?
46 posted on 02/11/2012 10:09:29 AM PST by JoSixChip (Top 10% of wage earners pay 70% of total income taxes collected. Bottom 50% pay less then 3%, fair?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
Wrong silly boy. Search my posts and you will see that I focus on who I support and analyze the weak points of their opponents (except for Paul “the nut job” Ron).

I am an avid defender of Gingrich and stand ready to promote him should he win the primary. I am just tired of the little attack toads who get so ingrained in their particular candidate that instead of promoting him they tear down others. Gingrich is a freaking genius... Santorum is a better candidate and has more and better positions for all the reasons I listed above. All candidates are flawed people. Santorum has fewer flaws than Gingrich both in electability and in track record/stated positions.

47 posted on 02/11/2012 10:15:46 AM PST by GulfBreeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

I guess its dissappointing when you have less than a twelve year old’s capacity at reasoning. What is the difference between you calling me a twelve year old and a 4 year old calling another four year old a “baby”. So what are you, A four year old? Ha Haaaa


48 posted on 02/11/2012 10:18:36 AM PST by GulfBreeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: GulfBreeze

You’re an idiot if you think tearing down every other candidate then claiming you are not is going to wash. You are seriously delusional.


49 posted on 02/11/2012 10:24:11 AM PST by CodeToad (NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: GulfBreeze

“weak points of their opponents “

So, you think pointing out our candidates’ weak points is helping them? If you are not helping a candidate then you are hurting them and we don’t want our candidates hurt by FReepers. If that logic escapes you, and it sure seems that it does, maybe you should just go back to DU and bash our candidates over there, troll.


50 posted on 02/11/2012 10:27:17 AM PST by CodeToad (NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

p*@@ off you liberal milk toast cry baby. You go back over to DU. Or head back to Obama’s camp where you came fom.


51 posted on 02/11/2012 10:31:08 AM PST by GulfBreeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: GulfBreeze

Yeah, you’re a big man. Just all mouth, really. Just like the liberal posters at DU.


52 posted on 02/11/2012 10:37:46 AM PST by CodeToad (NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

Your a lot of mouth too. I only go after folks who are on the attack themselves. I don’t bring up other candidates unless someone is doing the same. I would support Gingrich in a second and I have. Why aren’t you giving a hard time to one single Gingrich antagonizer out there jumping from Santorum thread to Santorum thread tearing Rick down. (Because you are not really worried about anyone tearing down candidates unless it is your candidate.) I am for Rick. I am for Gingrich, (but he is not electable, the “damaged goods” point was in reference to electability not intrinsic human worth), I would tolerate Romney (but I don’t think he is electable) Ron Paul? I just don’t know what to say, he is a nut job. I would support him over Obama though because he is a worse nut job.


53 posted on 02/11/2012 10:43:44 AM PST by GulfBreeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: GulfBreeze

“So, you think pointing out our candidates’ weak points is helping them? If you are not helping a candidate then you are hurting them and we don’t want our candidates hurt by FReepers.”

“I don’t bring up other candidates unless someone is doing the same.”

I was right. You simply don’t have the mental capacity to understand that under no circumstances do you bash your own side. You think there is provocation for doing so and that is then excusable. It isn’t. The owner of this site has been banning people left and right that can’t seem to understand that basic logical concept. You are one of those people. And, yes, for you feeble minded idiots, bringing up negative points of a candidate in an attempt to harm them is bashing them. Thanks for bashing our candidates … just like Obama and the rest of the Democrats do. What good company you keep.


54 posted on 02/11/2012 11:04:25 AM PST by CodeToad (NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
Your analysis of me is completely inaccurate. Sorry for calling you any names. You have some self analysis and to do.

I am going to leave of this argument because though I disagree with your various points against me. I agree with the central underlying motivation that you stated.

I will look forward to seeing you take on even one single Gingrich supporter antagonizing on the Santorum news threads.

55 posted on 02/11/2012 11:13:32 AM PST by GulfBreeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson