To anger nanny state libertarians like yourself who want to trample all over my right to representation on trying to have some public decency in the community I raise my children in.
Then why do you vote to make it illegal, as you said in post #37 you do?
To anger nanny state libertarians like yourself
Rather childish.
who want to trample all over my right to representation on trying to have some public decency in the community I raise my children in.
You had no response to my reply in post #30:
I have the right to represntation on issues whereas I feel the behavior of others is harmful to myself or my family.
If "what is harmful" is whatever a majority votes to be so, then those who claim to be "harmed" by you not giving them your money have won the day.
Many libertarians act as if they know better and want to deny you this right claiming that you need to have some sort of absolute proof that someones actions are directly harmful annd that all arguments that use a causation approach to showing the harm are not allowed to be used.
Libertarians are all for causation arguments - they just note that some such arguments are unfounded, for example, "some drug users harm others, therefore all drug use harms others."
You keep complaining about losing your right to representation, but you cant explain how your right to representation is threatened. Your rep can be for morality laws, mine can be against, and one of the sides will have more votes and win. That doesnt mean you arent represented. Why dont you just push for direct democracy?
Plus, didnt you say a few times you were leaving?