I’d heard or read somewhere that under Mexican law, a child of foreign (in this case, U.S.) parents, even if that child is born in Mexico, is not granted Mexican citizenship. So I’m guessing that meant that Mittens’ father was always considered to be a U.S. citizen like HIS parents were.
Anyone?
I don’t pretend to even start to understand the laws of Mexico but I do know that citizenship is not automatic for children born in Mexico of foreign parents but it is possible or at least it definately was in the past. Many LDS including many of Romney’s family fled to Mexico to escape polygamy laws in the U.S. most became Mexican citizens, some have dual citizenship (as recognized by Mexico) and some are just citizens of the United States. Some families fled back to the United States during the Mexican Revolution to further cloud the issue of their citizenship. Some LDS are even moving back to the U.S. now from Mexico to flee the drug war so somehow at least some have managed to keep their U.S. citizenship as well as Mexican citizenship.
I have heard that at the time of the large LDS migration to Mexico children born in Mexico of foreign parents could choose their citizenship (not sure if that included everyone or was just a special rule for the LDS that moved there)- parents could choose Mexican citizenship for their children or the children could so do for themselves after they reached a certain age. I have been told by Mexican citizens that Romney could claim Mexican citizenship now if he chose to do so. As far as I have heard Mitt Romney has never showed any interest in his family’s Mexican heritage/history even though he has Aunts, Uncles, cousins, etc. that are very prominent, very wealthy Mexican citizens/residents.
Mexican law doesn’t trump the US Constitution.
I think its pretty clear that the loser lawyer Santrorum is being bankrolled by Romney supporters to destroy Gingrich.
Minneapolis Star Tribune-2/8/12
“Mitt Romney and Foster Friess, a wealthy donor to conservative causes, were walking out of an event together a few months ago when Friess broke the news: After backing Romney for president four years ago, he was getting behind Rick Santorum this time around.
“He couldn’t quite figure out why Rick was even bothering to go through the effort,” Friess recalled Wednesday. “I mean, I don’t mean to fault him for saying, ‘Why take Rick seriously?’ Nobody took Rick seriously.”
Many more Republicans are taking Santorum seriously now, thanks to his victories in Minnesota, Missouri and Colorado on Tuesday — and perhaps none more than Romney, for whom Santorum’s unexpected rise poses another threat from the right.
‘The chairman of my board’
Few people played a more pivotal role in Tuesday’s turn of events than Friess. An investor who made millions in mutual funds and now lives in Wyoming, he is the chief backer of a super PAC that has helped keep Santorum’s candidacy alive by running TV ads on his behalf. His role as outside funder — one that Friess indicated he will continue to play — escalates the battle among a few dozen wealthy Republicans to influence their party’s choice of a presidential nominee.
Friess’ chosen outlet — the Red, White and Blue Fund — provided critical support for Santorum as he sought to resuscitate his campaign. At a time when Santorum could not afford to pay for a single commercial of his own, the fund focused in particular on Minnesota, where the super PAC supporting Romney, Restore Our Future, broadcast a last-minute blitz of ads against him, Kantar Media/CMAG said.
But Friess’ help could prove even more vital in the weeks ahead, as Santorum tries to capitalize on his upset victories to mount a more assertive challenge to Romney and to Newt Gingrich, who has an even more deep-pocketed supporter in the billionaire casino executive Sheldon Adelson, one of nation’s the richest men.
Friess is relatively rare among the major backers of super PACs for his close association with the religious conservative movement. His website quotes Scripture, and he often says that God is “the chairman of my board.”
He is also rare for his willingness to speak openly about his political giving, a break from Adelson, who has not spoken publicly about his donations of $10 million, with his wife, to the super PAC supporting Gingrich.
“There are not many donors who are really willing to be out there as such an advocate,” said the founder of Red, White and Blue, Nick Ryan. “It takes a little bit of the cloak and dagger out of the whole thing.”
‘Best chance to beat Barack Obama’
Friess, 71, said that he likes Santorum for his faith but also believes he is the best candidate to compete with President Obama, whom he blamed for excessive government. He said he came to know Santorum several years ago and particularly approved of his opposition to abortion rights and his hawkish foreign policy stance. “I’m not supporting him for how I’ve known him as a friend,” Friess said. “I’m supporting him because he has the best chance to beat Barack Obama.”
Asked what compelled him to give so much, he said, “No. 1, I think of all the guys that strap a gun on their backs and head to Afghanistan and Iraq to keep us free and safe and maintain what America has stood for, if I put up a million bucks or whatever, it doesn’t’ seem like much of a sacrifice.”
Friess ranks among the nation’s leading patrons of Republican and conservative causes. He has given hundreds of thousands of dollars to the Republican Party and candidates in recent years. Last year, he gave $100,000 to Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin to help fend off a Democratic-led recall effort.
Asked whether he would be prompted to donate more to the super PAC if Romney and the super PAC supporting him stepped up attacks on Santorum, Friess said: “Well, I think that if he does that it is so exciting, because it finally recognizes that Rick Santorum is a threat.”