Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks DIRTYSECRET. It’s a destroyer, a.k.a. tin can, a.k.a. target.


3 posted on 02/04/2012 12:58:32 PM PST by SunkenCiv (FReep this FReepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv
Thanks for the ping....

I find it surprising the Saudi's allowed this.

4 posted on 02/04/2012 1:07:07 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv
This is kind of interesting considering Iran doesn't have any operational destroyers. They have three WW2-era tincans that haven't been operational since the early-90's and four frigates in the 1,400-1,500 ton range. And none of their ship's listed on Global Security or any other site go by the name Shaid Qandi, so I don't know which ship this might be.
8 posted on 02/04/2012 6:24:30 PM PST by Stonewall Jackson ("I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson