“No I’m not confused. I’ve been reading his posts on the eligibility threads since 2008. That is my opinion.”
Oh, okay.
“By the way, all the Obama lovers have come out to gloat on this thread.”
No gloating here; weeping for the passing of our constitutional republic perhaps, but no gloating. :(
Georgia Judge Rules Against Plaintiffs: Attorney Mark Hatfield "taking it up on appeal"
"First, the Judge never made any ruling on who has the burden of proof even though he indicated in chambers prior to the hearing that making the determination of the burden of proof laid with Defendant Obama." He went onto state "the Judge has a record of placing the burden on the candidate, but didn't do so in this case." Another point Hatfield made was the “Indiana Court of Appeals ruling in Arkeny elevates the Indiana case above the Constitution" while also noting the Judge ignored the Minor court in Minor v Happersett, a ruling"
Funny how it's always the same ones who crawl out of the wood work, isn't it?
I used to love it when they would post that the system is too corrupt for any Court or politician to rise against obama, you know riots etc., but then would continue to insist we have to do it through the oh so honest electoral process.
Can't tell you how many times I almost sacrificed my monitotor over those....