To: Danae
More specifically, regardless of the chronology of enactment, the general clause can never govern the specific. But, but.. What about the Commerce Clause, where the very general is held to require all kinds of specifics?
4 posted on
01/27/2012 10:10:13 AM PST by
chesley
(Eat what you want, and die like a man. Never trust anyone who hasn't been punched in the face)
To: chesley
Holy mackerel. Shouldn’t the EPA also have some say in this litigation? I’m sure there must be a wet spot somewhere! LOL!
13 posted on
01/27/2012 10:28:35 AM PST by
rktman
To: chesley
“But, but.. What about the Commerce Clause, where the very general is held to require all kinds of specifics?”
That’s because the specifics belong to the general, they do not attempt to override it.
33 posted on
01/27/2012 11:13:49 AM PST by
Danae
(Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson