Posted on 01/25/2012 5:57:22 PM PST by Mr. K
Michael Jablonski260 Brighton Road, NEAtlanta, Georgia 30309michael.jablonski@comcast.com
RE: Georgia Presidential Preference Primary Hearings
Dear Mr. Jablonski:I received your letter expressing your concerns with the manner in which the Office of StateAdministrative Hearings ("OSAH") has handled the candidate challenges involving your client andadvising me that you and your client will "suspend" participation in the administrative proceeding. WhileI regret that you do not feel that the proceedings are appropriate, my referral of this matter to anadministrative law judge at OSAH was in keeping with Georgia law, and specifically O.C.G.A. § 21-2-5.As you are aware, OSAH Rule 616-1-2-.17 cited in your letter only applies to parties to a hearing. As thereferring agency, the Secretary of State's Office is not a party to the candidate challenge hearingsscheduled for tomorrow. To the extent a request to withdraw the case referral is procedurally available, Ido not believe such a request would be judicious given the hearing is set for tomorrow morning.In following the procedures set forth in the Georgia Election Code, I expect the administrative law judgeto report his findings to me after his full consideration of the evidence and law. Upon receipt of thereport, I will fully and fairly review the entire record and initial decision of the administrative law judge.Anything you and your client place in the record in response to the challenge will be beneficial to myreview of the initial decision; however, if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in theOSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.I certainly appreciate you contacting me about your concerns, and thank you for your attention to thismatter.Sincerely,Brian P. Kemp
Anyone know if Jablonski doesn’t show up do the other three lawyers still get to present all their stuff?
As it is obvious I am a know nothing of all things legal.
Nachum, put me on the ping list. Thanks...
The lawyers of the three plaintiffs have already presented all their stuff. Obama’s lawyers submitted their answer, which was so weak the judge informed the parties that the plaintiffs need no submit a reply to the defense answer. That is highly unusual.
In doing so, the judge telegraphed to the parties that he beileves the plaintiffs case is so strong he intends to rule in favor of the plaintiffs. If this were not the case, the judge would have not told the planitffs to not submit a reply
If this goes against His Majesty, the die is cast. Who but the most loyal of his SS Nazi supporters would believe he is not a complete fraud.
If this ever gets to the level of proving he is not entitled to have been President, all hell will break loose. Many in DC will, make that should, resign in disgrace. Of course that is fantasy on my part. I cannot express how much I would love to see this vile being drug out of the whitehouse and tossed into the pokey.
Gotcha. A full hearing would be much better than my suggestion.
HAZ-MAT should take care of that.
Here’s exactly two cents worth of opinion- for Jablonski to completely ignore the filings of two other plaintiffs in his latest ‘response’ in an attempt to besmirch Orly Taitz, is beyond pale/desperate. If freepers are picking up on the tact, imagine the Judge’s intuition? Sorry, not a lawyerly reply. How ya’ been? Keep the faith.
;o)
freepersup
Place mark....thanks for the link, Obama Exposer. It’s a little early for me in AZ but I’m sure there’ll be a thread about it tomorrow.
Put the Usurper in the same cell where he imprisoned Colonel Lakin.
Thanks
???
Is that Whoa Jablonski?
Well now!!! Doesn’t that read sweetly?
Still... Bammy and his henchmen are sneaky characters. I’m not popping any champagne corks yet, but I might lay in a bottle just in case.
Headline at Orly’s website...
GA SEC OF STATE TELLS OBAMA, NO CRYING TO MOMMY, MAN UP OR TOUGH LUCK. SWEET!
Ping
Candidate Obama will not appear on the ballot is more than likely the outcome. If other states' plaintiffs filed suit since each state is sovereign, they could expect the same result.
Obama may be occupying the White House but this has to do with meeting each state's elgilbility requirements for President. He is a candidate for the office he seeks.
Perhaps of interest to you,if you have not seen it yet.
Thank you.
.
Thanks potlatch.
Null and void pinged everyone while I was offline.
Counsel, what makes you say that? Isn’t the ALJ hearing the matter (Malihi) in effect empowered to make determinations of eligibility for a candidate to be placed on the Georgia ballot? As others have pointed out, the Constitution does delegate this power to the individual states.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.