Posted on 01/25/2012 5:57:22 PM PST by Mr. K
Michael Jablonski260 Brighton Road, NEAtlanta, Georgia 30309michael.jablonski@comcast.com
RE: Georgia Presidential Preference Primary Hearings
Dear Mr. Jablonski:I received your letter expressing your concerns with the manner in which the Office of StateAdministrative Hearings ("OSAH") has handled the candidate challenges involving your client andadvising me that you and your client will "suspend" participation in the administrative proceeding. WhileI regret that you do not feel that the proceedings are appropriate, my referral of this matter to anadministrative law judge at OSAH was in keeping with Georgia law, and specifically O.C.G.A. § 21-2-5.As you are aware, OSAH Rule 616-1-2-.17 cited in your letter only applies to parties to a hearing. As thereferring agency, the Secretary of State's Office is not a party to the candidate challenge hearingsscheduled for tomorrow. To the extent a request to withdraw the case referral is procedurally available, Ido not believe such a request would be judicious given the hearing is set for tomorrow morning.In following the procedures set forth in the Georgia Election Code, I expect the administrative law judgeto report his findings to me after his full consideration of the evidence and law. Upon receipt of thereport, I will fully and fairly review the entire record and initial decision of the administrative law judge.Anything you and your client place in the record in response to the challenge will be beneficial to myreview of the initial decision; however, if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in theOSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.I certainly appreciate you contacting me about your concerns, and thank you for your attention to thismatter.Sincerely,Brian P. Kemp
Correct. It is also the beginning of the end everywhere else!
The judge would have no option but to grant a default judgement, which in effect declares that the “candidate” did not provide evidence of his eligibility. :)
It’s 9 an no one on the defense side is there yet. I have seen two TV cameras as well....
Excellent. Let's hope for the best on this front.
I haven’t read the case itself, except the passages that apply to the NBC definition and D’Onofrio’s briefing. It says Obama is not NBC. Period.
I was referring to another person. Of course every person was a noob at one time! Just sometimes when a person is egregiously troll-like, and on top of it has a very resent signup date...
Posting history reveals all, actually.
“.. is that a flicker of a light at the end of the tunnel I see?”
We can hope. We can hope.
Am listening to livestreaming from GA courtroom right now, hard to make out what Taitz is saying. Missed the earlier 2 attorneys. Judge told her to move it along, but is allowing all her witnesses.
Because ALJs have very little power except as it pertains to the Agency itself. Practically, and actually, they are not really judges and are easily overturned by any judicial authority. You simply must exhaust your Administrative appeals before you can get to a “real” court.
Not saying I don’t appreciate the Obama Admin being jerked around, just saying an ALJ hearing isn’t going to accomplish much of anything and is relatively meaningless.
I’m just not persuaded by what you say. Perhaps things are different in GA, but where I practice, an ALJ is not dismissed so lightly and there rulings can be enforced in the trial court system with the full power of the court behind you.
I’m not interested in Obama being jerked around, just that the American people should not be jerked around.
I’m just not persuaded by what you say. Perhaps things are different in GA, but where I practice, an ALJ is not dismissed so lightly and there rulings can be enforced in the trial court system with the full power of the court behind you.
I’m not interested in Obama being jerked around, just that the American people should not be jerked around.
Since the professional-looking copy was farther down the screen, I did not see it until AFTER I had replied.
However, since it WAS farther down the screen, I thought someone had taken the original gargage and cleaned it up.
Thanx.
Todays long thread;
OBAMA ELIGIBILITY HEARING TO BE STREAMED LIVE STARTING AT 0900 EST
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2838105/posts?page=62#62
Don’t know when we’ll hear the outcome but it seemed to go well and Obama and lawyer didn’t appear.
Nice call. Obama is a no show and a flame out to boot.
Thanks! I’m sorry I missed it. There are so many posts on that thread and I don’t have time to read all of them.
Do you know what happened?
Hi DC, I’ve barely been online today but I did make notes as I read through the thread. It’s a mish-mash of people’s comments as they listened to the live coverage - as I’m unable to do that myself due to hearing.
This thread has stopped so I’ll just post my ‘notes’ as I jotted them;
Obama’s attorney never even showed up.
The first witness Submitted BC downloaded from the Whitehouse website.
Evidence was introduced that the Sr. OBama was never a U.S. citizen.
He’s presented the 2008 certified document signed by pelosi saying Barry was eligible to be the Dem nominee.
Obama’s ‘official’ schedule is ‘no events scheduled’ today. He is actually in Vegas area with Michelle.
They’re establishing that the certification the DNC sent to the Georgia Secretary of State, officially notifying them of Obama’s nomination to the presidency, does NOT claim that he is eligible for the office as it is supposed to do.
Apparently the Dem ballot certification and the Repub.
certification differ in that the Dem version omits the requirement to meet eligibility requirements.
* There was a letter yesterday from Barrys atty saying they did not want the proceedings to go forward and they did not want to participate.. [posted below]
Side note: Hawaii would not use the same form - they demanded and got standard form specifying constitutional
requirements. Therefore, signatures to Hawaii forms are guilty of perjury.
http://obamaballotchallenge.com
The attorney just introduced the certification letters from GOP and Dims for 2008 election,POINTING OUT THE DIFFERENCE IN LANGUAGE.
David farrar is the witness
Orly is rambling and it seems to be irratating the Judge.
This is not a state district court. It is an administrative law court set up by GA law under Article II Section 1 powers.
Orly hammering on the CT-issued SSN issue. A P.I. from OHIO, who looked into Obamas SSN, said she’s never seen anything like this in all her years.
The original person with SS was born in 1890
They ran SSN for address in MASS, IL,
ending in 24 and 29 those were both issued in Mar 1977 when he was 13yrs..........
Now Adobe expert testifying about suspicious ‘layers’ in bc document.
Sampson - There would be a criminal investigation for Obama ...answering Taitz’s question.
Orly is saying that Barry couldnt practice law because of the different name problem [!!!!???] [I never heard that before!]
Judge asked Taitz to get on with her closing argument and submit her testimony in writing.
[ her accent is poor and has irritated the judge through this]
Judge Malihi hearing ends. Asks for Taitz’s exhibits.
The judge promptly left the court room. No indication when he will deliver his ruling to the Secretary of State.
The SSN number Barry is using right now FAILS THE GOVERNMENTS OWN VALIDITY CHECKS!!!
[So his tax returns would be fraudulent?]
I read that Administrative Court decisions can not be appealed. You can’t appeal an executive decision.
January 26, 2012
Obama to continue campaign, ignore subpoena on Thursday
By Adam Jablonowski - The Daily
Caller Published: 10:29 AM
01/26/2012 | Updated: 10:31 AM 01/26/2012
It was posted that Obama was in Vegas at the time.
Bless your heart! Thank you so much!
“different name problem”
Obama and Soetero would be the problem there, I would think.
What great notes! You are a gem!
You’re welcome DC. Anxious to hear the outcome.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.