We are propagandists and that's okay,
We sleep all night and extoll all day.
Posted on 01/24/2012 5:52:49 AM PST by iontheball
BREAKING: The Rodger Hedgecock Show; 6:00 – 9:00 pm EST (www.RodgerHedgecock.com) 877-847-6437 (January 23, 2012)
At ~ 4:20 pm PST (hour 2), Rodger began talking about how we know nothing about Obama; no one knew him at Columbia (e.g., George Stephanopoulos and Wayne Allyn Root – supposed classmates); etc. etc., and why doesn’t the media ask these questions?
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
The media didn’t ask and never will. The man is a Socialist, a foreigner, a Muslim. He represents everything we despise in this country....so naturally he’s the darling of the Left.
Oh....and he’s half black. That’s good enough, ya see.
I used to listen to Roger back in San Diego. Glad to see he’s on Obama’s case.
Oh, and he’s the idol of every Democrat. They always seem to want to take the path that causes the most damage to the US, so why wouldnt he be?
Oh....and he’s half black. That’s good enough, ya see.
But, but shouldn’t they be hating the white part?
The MSM is the left’s waterboys. They need to be brought down somehow. I wish I knew how.
What about snorting coke off Larry Sinclairs’.....lap?
“why doesn’t the media ask these questions?”
They prolly already know. Their job is to keep it a secret.
why doesn’t the media ask these questions?
The media do not ask questions which give them either:
A) Answers they already know
B) Answers they do not want the public to hear
C) Answers which make democrats look bad
D) Answers which make republicans look good
Working backwards, the question should be:
Is the reason the media does not probe into Obama’s past because they already know about it, they don’t want the public to hear about it or they think it’ll make him look bad? Or some combination of those three?
link the land of Obama
My company used to send me to black tie dinners all the time.
On two occasions I sat by two different Houston Chronicle reporters.
Interestingly, both reporters told me that they were forbidden by their management to investigate or write about a major mafia money launderer who gives generously to the democrat party.
Both journalists were liberals, but they were very upset that the Chronicle was protecting a mafia leader.
He’s still laundering drug profits and still funding democrats.
What is troubling to me and I believe many other Americas is the direction Obama is taking this country. Obama is more than a European socialist, but a true Marxist who has no problem with pushing his agenda by executive decree. I fear in another four years Obama will rule as a Marxist dictator like Ortega and Chavez.
An illegal alien, a muslim and a marxist walk into a bar.
Bartender asks, what will you have Mr. president?
“Obama is more than a European socialist, but a true Marxist”
People argue that he couldn’t be a Marxist because he is into corporate cronyism and surrounds himself with big money Wall Street benefactors.
But, every good Marxist knows that they must fund the revolution. The Chinese figured this out. They take the money from the Capitalists to maintain power.
Obama amasses money from the rich donors — nearly a billion dollars — just like Marxist revolutionaries rob banks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.