That's a good point. Krauthammer said "It's analysis, not advocacy". Yeah that's a little bite of a weasel out, but it's true.
While Krauthammer IMHO appears to be even keeled in his "analysis". Hume does not. His verbiage and commentary structure indicates a clear bias AGAINST Newt.
“That’s a good point. Krauthammer said “It’s analysis, not advocacy”. Yeah that’s a little bite of a weasel out, but it’s true.
While Krauthammer IMHO appears to be even keeled in his “analysis”. Hume does not. His verbiage and commentary structure indicates a clear bias AGAINST Newt. “
But don’t forget that Kraut is a psychologist who used to work for the dems.
I don’t trust him at all.
He actively participated in the take-down of Herman Cain, who was our best chance for the most freedom this go-round.
But God is in control, so I guess it wasn’t to be, this time.
My position from here on out, is whoever the media hates / fears most, is who gets my support.
Newt.
Who can best articulate for the nomination, and in the general, that liberty is what makes America great?
Newt.
Read on another thread last Night that Brit has a personal issue against Newt, and probably should be recusing himself from analysis.
I lost a lot of respect for him lately, and he used to be one of my favorites.