Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: RummyChick

Minor V. Happersett 1875 says otherwise. It has NEVER been overturned, instead it has been cited dozens and dozens of times in 136 years.


445 posted on 01/20/2012 9:26:13 PM PST by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies ]


To: Danae; RummyChick
“Minor V. Happersett 1875 says otherwise. It has NEVER been overturned, instead it has been cited dozens and dozens of times in 136 years.”

What we are concerned with today is how this SCOTUS will view “born in the country of parents who are citizens” if considering Baby Barry, born with unitary US citizenship from his US citizen mother...and not in any way a foreigner or alien...which were the only “as opposed to” categories mentioned by the Court in Minor.

I predict that this SCOTUS would rule that Barry is NBC if he were determined to have been born a bastard to his US legally single US citizen mom, and was therefor NOT a dual citizen at birth.

465 posted on 01/20/2012 10:07:50 PM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies ]

To: Danae

Minor says NO SUCH THING and you continue to ignore it.The Chief Justice DECLINED to address anything but what was relevant to that case and CLEARLY stated so.


503 posted on 01/21/2012 6:01:27 AM PST by RummyChick (It's a Satan Sandwich with Satan Fries on the side - perfect for Obama 666)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson