Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Gaffer
Shame is virtually non-existent today. In fact, shame has been replaced with arrogant defiance. I see it in the demeanor of each EBT leech I get behind at WalMart EVERY time I go buy something. The only cash they have to pony up for their visit is for cigarettes, wine or beer. They are disgusting. This will all come crashing down one day soon.

Yep. What we should do here is get rid of these 'debit' cards and go back to the old school stamps. As I recall, one of the reasons given for the switch was to save these 'poor' souls the embarrassment of using them.
28 posted on 01/16/2012 8:54:31 AM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Svartalfiar

They don’t even care about the stigma any more. So many of them use them that it is now a status symbol among the slothful.


30 posted on 01/16/2012 9:05:02 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: Svartalfiar

With UPC codes it would be very simple to set up the EBT cards to authorize ONLY “appropriate” food/goods for the users....rice, beans, fresh fruit, vegetables, chicken, tuna, diapers...etc.


32 posted on 01/16/2012 9:05:42 AM PST by goodnesswins (2012..."We mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our Sacred Honor")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: Svartalfiar
I will actually one-up you on that. Don't go back to the old-style stamps; go farther back than that.

Give out "commodities."

Dried beans and peas, rice, canned tuna, peanut butter, flour, corn meal, powdered milk, raisins, cheese, maybe some other canned foods. I suppose these were purchased from farmers or food processors by the government and given out monthly. This was subsistence food. You might not eat royally, but you would eat well enough to keep body and soul together. That is what was done back in the 1960's.

I remember it well because I had relatives on "welfare" who got these government commodities. Some of the items they "wouldn't eat." These items were given to my mother by the relative and we ate them. (Our menu choices at home were "take it or leave it.")

If anyone is truly in need of the food and assistance, they will take the commodities. If they refuse this type of assistance, then they aren't in that much need. It's pretty hard to trade your dried beans or rice for drugs, too.

I suspect that going back to the commodities would decrease the amount of $$ spent on "food assistance" dramatically.

38 posted on 01/16/2012 9:26:40 AM PST by susannah59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson