Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: NaturalBornConservative

Nicely done!

Out of curiosity, have you taken either your new min or max calculations and looked at trending?

It would be interesting to look at the last 20 years or so with your new eyeglasses. ;-)


17 posted on 01/15/2012 3:42:17 PM PST by MV=PY (The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MV=PY
Out of curiosity, have you taken either your new min or max calculations and looked at trending?

The BLS didn't start tracking those not in the labor, by who did or did not want to work, until 1994. However, I just created an (unadjusted) table comparing the Annual Change in the Labor Force from 1947 to 2011. It's interesting to note that aside from the past three years (2009, 2010, and 2011), the last time there was a net decline in the Labor Force was in 1951. However, the decline in 1951 was due to a general decline in the non-Institutional Civilian Population. So that makes Obama's misrepresentation unprecedented. It's outright manipulation.

Here's a link to my spreadsheet, with data pulled directly from the BLS: Civilian Population vs. Labor Force - 1947 to 2011.

21 posted on 01/15/2012 5:39:11 PM PST by NaturalBornConservative ("Something that everyone knows isn't worth knowing" ~ Bernard Baruch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson