Current Quarter Expenses.
Donate Today!
Posted on 01/15/2012 1:36:49 PM PST by ednoonan7
THREE MORE “OBAMA BALLOT CHALLENGES” REPORTED TO HAVE BEEN FILED IN ILLINOIS
It has just been reported to me that three more nationwide challenges to Obama appearing on the upcoming primary ballots have been filed. This time, it is with the Illinois State Board of Elections.
My source of this information is http://obamaballotchallenge.com/3-obama-ballot-challenges-in-illinois-now. Here the OBAMA BALLOT CHALLENGE group links directly to the Illinois State Board of Elections where the three petitioners are shown:
[See image here]
What is curious is that two dates for “objection” be to filed is past. The Freeman file expired on the 10th, and the Jackson and Meroni’s date of final objection time is the 13th. This would have been last Thursday… so what gives? Will the Obama people still be able to object even though the date has come and gone?
You can also read more about the Article II matter at: http://www.art2superpac.com/index.html
Edward C. Noonan NBC President 2012
If they were filed in ILL-ANNOY, this is a huge dead-end. Neither the Illinois AG (the Speaker’s daughter), nor Eric “The Coward” Holder, nor the Chicago-based AstroTurf Factory will allow anything remotely like this to continue.
FYI
Same thing as in Hawaii, but every time the system shows its corruption for everybody to see, the more people have to realize that this is not really about Obama at all, but about a government and media that is entirely taken over by lawlessness and corruption.
If we let the Chicago and Hawaii mobs keep the rest of the country from knowing the truth about the illegal usurping enemy combatant in the White House, then the whole country is under the power of the mob, and the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the US Constitution means nothing.
Heck, as long as the HI judge can get away with totally ignoring the Full Faith and Credit Act, then how about every SOS in the union reject the notary signature on the DNC Official Certification of Nomination because it’s not from their own state? Why should Nebraska, for instance, accept a notary signature from somebody who is only authorized to be a notary in North Carolina? If Hawaii doesn’t have to accept the subpoena of a Georgia judge, then why should Nebraska have to accept a notarization from NC?
49 can play at this game...
The reason the left wants Mitt is his father was born in Mexico. As soon as this hits the fan it will be Mitt’s dad is not born in US either! You are a racist if you leave him off the ballot.
Mitt’s dad was a citizen. that should change the conversation ?
if the GOVERNOR of a state must swear to uphold the US Constitution, as well as his own state...
then WHY does it take an average citizen to force something as basic as checking eligibility to assume office?
it is the DUTY of the governor to insure the US Constitution is upheld, at least as far as something as simple as eligibility is concerned. if the governor did not obtain eligibility authentication... then he/she was negligent in their duties and should be removed from office
how is my logic unsound?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.