[Darkwolf377]

Geez whiz.... I never said that YOU said you were bothered by my posting of Santorum's record. It's simply MY observation of your responses to that posting. You're obviously upset about it, as evidenced by the tirades you've been posting at me.

If you're truly interested in a discussion, why do you keep avoiding it?

Last chance:

Should I base my decision to vote for Newt on his voting record of the nineties, or his current words?

[Darkwolf377]

Geez whiz.... I never said that YOU said you were bothered by my posting of Santorum's record

Your previous tirade:

If my posting of Rick Santorum's actual Senate voting record bothers you so much...

Your own words show your inability to just deal with the actual points. You prefer to just go round and round, insinuating personal insult when all you have to do is answer one simple question...which you repeatedly refuse to do.

I have no more time for folks who can't be honest.

[RasterMaster]

The Newties wouldn’t want you to base your decision on anything Newt has done since leaving Congress in disgrace (after being fined $300,000 for ethics violations), such as pushing for the DNC Gorebull warming myth, his praise of Hitlery Clinton, or his “education tour” with race-baiting poverty pimp Al Sharpton.

[Windflier]

Should I base my decision to vote for Newt on his voting record of the nineties, or his current words?

Have you looked up Newt's voting record yet?