Good God, why are you trying to obfuscate instead of facing the facts?
I never said YOU said I lied--clip and paste it if that's the case. You can't, because I didn't say anything of the kind, I ASKED you if NEWT was lying,
You keep talking about 'post his voting record' when I have already addressed that.
Why must you invent these phony disputes? You couldn't engage the DIRECT QUOTES from Newt, so you bring up his voting record. I in turn said, "Which should I pay attention to--his voting record of the nineties, or what he's sqaying NOW?
Just answer that question. I have no use for all the "Look over there!" foolishness. Santorum's voting record? Who brought THAT up, and what does that have to do with Newt's being a big-government type--which, you seem to keep geting away from because I've posted the evidence supporting it.
Answer that one simple question--do I decide on whether I support Newt or not based on his voting record of a decade a ago, OR what's addressed in these answers to your initial request--his words NOW?
You're angry, and now throwing bricks at me. I told you that I acknowledged Newt's travels 'off the reservation', ergo, I'm not disputing the validity of the facts you presented.
Trust me, those things bother me as well, but they don't overshadow Newt's overwhelmingly positive record of service in office.
What bothered me about the snippets you posted, were the opinions and hyperbole embedded. It wasn't a simple and clear statement of Newt's record of votes, like what I posted.
If my posting of Rick Santorum's actual Senate voting record bothers you so much, why not dig up Newt's voting record and post it for comparison? They served in Congress during the same time.