Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No BCS National Championship Game This Year
town hall ^ | 1/09/12 | reasonmclucus

Posted on 01/09/2012 1:50:51 PM PST by kathsua

For the first time since the BCS held its first "national championship" game after the 1998 season, there won't be any bowl game that can realistically be portrayed as a "national championship" game.

This year's game can only be considered as giving the University of Alabama an opportunity to avenge its loss against Louisiana State University(LSU). The two schools can only play for the championship of the western division of the Southeast Conference(SEC). Alabama cannot even claim the championship of the SEC from a victory because that would require Alabama to defeat eastern division champion , the University of Georgia.

LSU cannot prove it deserves a national championship by defeating a school it has already defeated, particularly a school that mostly defeated the same schools that LSU defeated. LSU needs to defeat the champion of another conference in the championship game to prove it is the best team in the country

An Alabama victory would indicate the two schools are equal rather than that Alabama is the best because they would each have one victory over the other. A third game would be necessary to prove Alabama was the better team. In those sports in which the champion must win multiple games against the other team, the champion must win a majority of the games.

The SEC will be the big loser in the game because it will lose its undefeated record in the game regardless of which team wins. Alabama and LSU are both undefeated in the so-called championship game. One of them will lose that status.

The NCAA does allow a conference runner up to play the conference champion for the national basketball championship, but only after the challenger has defeated the other teams in its bracket to get into the championship game.

The NFL allows the runner up in a division to play the division winner in a conference championship but only after the runner up has defeated two other teams. Two teams in the same division cannot play each other in the Super Bowl. The Super Bowl participants must be from different conferences.

Those who suffer from the delusion that a computer or sports writers, etc can choose the best two teams ignore the fact that it isn't unusual for teams rated by writers or computers to lose to teams that are rated lower.

It's time for people to realize that the claim that a BCS bowl game is for a national championship is just a public relations gimmick. The only valid way to determine a national football champion is for teams to earn their way into a championship game by defeating other teams that aspire to be the national champion.

Determining a legitimate NCAA major college football champion wouldn't necessarily require extending the college football season longer than it is now with the phony BCS championship game. There would need to be a way to get the number of teams playing for the championship down to 8 for a 3-round tournament which could include some of the existing bowl games.

With the ongoing conference changes, the number of conferences could change in the next few years. Champions from smaller conferences could play qualifying games after the end of the season, possibly the same weekend some of the large conferences have their championship games. The extra game would provide money for the schools and their conferences.

The first round of the tournament could come just before Christmas or be part of the New Year's day bowl games. Having the first round on New Year's would be especially attractive for the Big 10 and Pac 12 because it would allow their champions to play in the Rose Bowl and still participate in a championship tournament.

The college bowl games aren't nearly as important as they used to be. Most of them are on cable because they don't attract sufficient advertising to be worth a bidding war among the broadcast networks like there is for the Super Bowl.

A true championship tournament could be as popular as the NCAA basketball tournament is. At the very least the schools participating in the tournament would make money for themselves and their conferences.


TOPICS: Music/Entertainment; Sports; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: bcs; bowl; champion; football
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: dfwgator
Anybody who doesn’t think the best two teams are playing tonight, is crazy.

Present.

Oklahoma State might just have something to say about the best team given a system in place to allow it. Neither LSU nor Al have faced an offense of their caliber. True enuff that OK St's defense is wanting and would yield 24-30 pts, but it's not inconceivable that they'd could stay on the field with either of the participants tonight. Just for argument's sake.

But these three have clearly separated themselves from the pack; even Ron Paul would probably agree.

41 posted on 01/09/2012 2:39:53 PM PST by Dysart (#Changeitback)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Will88

Do you make that same statement about the Super Bowl, and the NCAA tournament, where there could easily be cases where the winner had been previously defeated by the loser.


The NFL and College Basketball require a team to win their way into the championship game through a playoff system. If the NFL used the Bowl system Green Bay would have never been invited to the Superbowl last year, it would have been the Patriots vs the Falcons...........but somehow neither made it that far.


42 posted on 01/09/2012 2:40:50 PM PST by JohnKinAK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Dysart

You underestimate just how good Alabama and LSU is on offense, and both defenses made the other look silly....no other defense in the country comes close to those two.


43 posted on 01/09/2012 2:42:21 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

IF ONE OF THESE TEAMS WINS THE NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP,
PLEASE MAKE A DONATION TO FREE REPUBLIC.



Click the Pic


Support Free Republic

44 posted on 01/09/2012 2:45:26 PM PST by deoetdoctrinae (Gun-Free zones are playgrounds for felons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: kathsua
It's easy to see why the BCS pitted #1 LSU against #2 Alabama for the BCS National Championship game. It's the only way they could ensure that an SEC team would lose the National Championship game! LOL!

Heck, even our 3rd place SEC West division Arkansas Razorbacks won the Cotton Bowl and finished the season 11-2 and could likely end up in the top 5 at season's end.

45 posted on 01/09/2012 2:52:49 PM PST by OB1kNOb (The prudent see danger and take refuge, but the simple keep going and pay the penalty. - Prov 22:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnKinAK
The statement from you I responded to:

If Bama beats LSU tonight, then what? Since LSU already beat Bama, each could claim the BCS Championship, since each would only have one loss - to each other.

There are many situations in sports where each team could have one loss, to each other, but only one win a championship, or advance in a tournament. That was the point you made and it is a fairly ridiculous point because the situation you describe is so common.

46 posted on 01/09/2012 2:52:57 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I definitely don’t underestimate their defenses, but it’s remotely possible I undervalue their offenses. Still, OSU’s O is superior to both and would allow them to be competitive. Besides OSU has a secret weapon— their head coach is a MAN.


47 posted on 01/09/2012 2:57:57 PM PST by Dysart (#Changeitback)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: kathsua

I love all these drones mindlessly claiming that LSU and Ala are obviously the number 1 and number 2. Says who? I guess that the Steelers should go on to play the Pats rather than the Broncos, and the Canucks should be given the Stanley Cup by virtue of their regular season, since they finished with 14 points more than Boston. Oh, and forget about those pretenders VCU and Butler. Duke should have been crowned the champ last year.


48 posted on 01/09/2012 3:25:02 PM PST by jimmygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sudetenland
Not a fan of BCS, but it's the best solution we've got unless you want to extend the college season into February with a bracket of 16.

I'm going to let you in on a huge secret. There are college football teams that engage in a 16-team playoff series. It's a dirty little secret that the BCS and Division I athletic departments and media try to keep hidden from Division I fans.

Three out of the four college divisions that play college football have 16-team playoffs.

FCS: http://www.ncaa.com/interactive-bracket/football/fcs

Division II:http://www.ncaa.com/interactive-bracket/football/d2

Division III: http://www.ncaa.com/interactive-bracket/football/d3

16 Teams
First Round: November 19
Second Round: November 26
Quarterfinals: December 3
Semifinals: December 10
Championship: Dec 17

I had an athletic director from a public BCS school with over 25,000 students and plenty of money tell me to my face that BCS teams doesn't have the resources to engage in a playoff series and that the players couldn't handle it.

And yet, Division III PoDunk University with 2,200 students and which is a private university has the resources to compete in a 16-team playoff series.

No offense to alumni of the University of Mount Union which came in second to the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater in the Division III championship.

I just find it amusing that a huge school with tens of thousands of students and alumni who donate millions to athletics doesn't have the resources to compete in a playoff series, but a privately funded university with 2,200 students does.
49 posted on 01/09/2012 3:39:20 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr; All

My mistake, I forget that Division I-AA/FCS are the same.


50 posted on 01/09/2012 3:42:45 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
The more playoff rounds you have, the more injuries will play a role.

OH NO! EVERYBODY, YOUR ATTENTION PLEASE: IMMEDIATELY INFORM YOUR LOCAL HIGH SCHOOLS NOT TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY KIND OF PLAYOFFS BECAUSE MORE INJURIES MIGHT OCCUR!

Texas has a 64-team playoff series for some of the high school football divisions.

Division I, Division II, and Division III college football teams all have 16-team playoffs and have been doing so for years.

Nobody is calling for them to stop playing based on injuries.

Face it: BCS is the only college football division that doesn't have a playoff series. The other college football divisions do, and most states have playoffs for their high school teams.
51 posted on 01/09/2012 3:48:24 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

“Then it will be a matter of percentages. By how many points did Alabama win? Total yards by both teams in both games. First downs, possession times, and stuff like that.”

Yeah, that’s much better than actually playing a game...

Steelers were favored by 10.5.


52 posted on 01/09/2012 3:50:41 PM PST by PilotDave (No, really, you just can't make this stuff up!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Will88

Yes, but 12 teams make the NFL Playoffs and 68 schools make the NCAA Tournament. It’s absurd in a sport where only two teams can play for the championship that a team could lose to a team in the regular season and beat them to win the championship.


53 posted on 01/09/2012 4:00:17 PM PST by conservativebuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye

Lol, it would be even more absurd if teams that had lost to third rate opponents such as OSU did were to play for a championship this year. Give it up. This is what we have this year and practically every commentator agrees that the two best teams are playing, from the conference that will win it’s sixth straight BCS title tonight.

It’s even more absurd to suggest that clearly inferior teams should be in a championship game simply because they played in weaker conferences.

Work to bring about a playoff system that includes more teams, but this is what we have this year and it is the right matchup.

Does the inclusion of 64+ teams end all disputes in the NCAA tournament???


54 posted on 01/09/2012 4:10:11 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: 6ppc

From your fingertips to God’s ears. Roll Tide!


55 posted on 01/09/2012 4:15:33 PM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Will88
Does the inclusion of 64+ teams end all disputes in the NCAA tournament???

A 16 team playoff series, like the other three college football divisions have, would end most disputes.

And it's doable - the NCAA works it out for the other three college football divisions.
56 posted on 01/09/2012 4:26:08 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
A 16 team playoff series, like the other three college football divisions have, would end most disputes.

Tell that to the 17th team.

57 posted on 01/09/2012 4:26:58 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Tell that to the 17th team.

Better than the current system. At least with 16 teams, the top half dozen teams will have a clear chance at showing whether or not they deserve their rankings.

The other three college football divisions do it every year, and nobody disputes the winner. The cream will rise to the top under a 16 team playoff system.

There are no excuses for the BCS division not to have some kind of playoff system, even if it's only 4 teams, other than greed and money.
58 posted on 01/09/2012 4:40:17 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
A 16 team playoff series, like the other three college football divisions have, would end most disputes.

The opposite: the larger the field, the more teams that almost make it, as the expanded NCAA tournament field has demonstrated over the years with more "bubble teams" and more disputes.

And the major conferences would never agree to conference champs only because the disparity of competition in different conferences is so great.

Do you remember when the NCAA tournament field was only 12 or 16 teams, mostly conference champions? Far fewer disputes then than now with 64+. There were years and years where the only SEC team to make the tournament was Kentucky, but no disputes since only one could go, and the basketball talent was more evenly spread than football talent.

No system will end disputes, they just need to decide how much to expand the NCAA football championship field beyond two teams.

59 posted on 01/09/2012 4:41:08 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Will88

No “bubble team” would be able to lay claim to the national championship game under the current system, so a 16 game playoff would be an improvement over the current system. Teams ranked that low are 2-3 loss teams or 1-loss teams with an easy schedule. What would be really exciting is the final weeks of the regular season, where teams would be vying for the cutoff position!


60 posted on 01/09/2012 4:47:21 PM PST by jimmygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson